Skip to main content
. 2001 May 19;322(7296):1214. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1214

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and characteristics of those followed up compared with original randomised sample

Baseline characteristics Booklet Summary card Control  Review of notes
Questionnaire at 1 year
Followed up Not followed up Followed up Not followed up
Mean (SD) age (years)  37 (20)  37 (20)  38 (20)  38 (20)  31 (18)  40 (21)  34 (19)
No (%) female 487 (49) 514 (53) 493 (50) 1494 (50) 336 (52) 1062 (54) 768 (47)
Occupational status (median (interquartile range)):
 Non-manual* 0.50 (0.30 to 0.66) 0.50 (0.29 to 0.66) 0.52 (0.31 to 0.67) 0.53 (0.35 to 0.68) 0.37 (0.20 to 0.53) 0.54 (0.36 to 0.70) 0.45 (0.24 to 0.63)
 Retired* 0.21 (0.10 to 0.35) 0.21 (0.10 to 0.33) 0.22 (0.11 to 0.34) 0.22 (0.11 to 0.35) 0.20 (0.07 to 0.32) 0.21 (0.10 to 0.33) 0.21 (0.11 to 0.35)
 Economically inactive* 0.10 (0.03 to 0.21) 0.10 (0.04 to 0.22) 0.10 (0.04 to 0.21) 0.10 (0.03 to 0.20) 0.13 (0.07 to 0.27) 0.09 (0.03 to 0.19) 0.12 (0.05 to 0.25)
No (%) consulting in past year for:
 Acute respiratory conditions  (⩾once) 189 (19) 224 (23) 213 (22)
 Minor illness (⩾twice) 255 (26) 289 (30) 272 (28)
 All consultations (⩾5 times) 279 (28) 279 (29) 299 (30)
*

For each individual: from census data linked to postcodes we derived the proportions of individuals in non-manual work, retired, or economically inactive in their postal enumeration district. Percentages of participants who had notes reviewed.