Table 5.
Hazard ratios; common to resistance locations | ||
---|---|---|
Pathway | Hazard | Confidence Bounds |
43 → 103 | 1.92 | (0.85, 4.35) |
49 → 103 | 0.46 | (0.20, 1.07) |
67 → 70 | 4.66 | (2.17, 9.99) |
67 → 190 | 3.31 | (1.70, 6.42) |
68 → 184 | 1.93 | (1.21, 3.08) |
70 → 103 | 1.01 | (0.49, 2.08) |
70 → 181 | 0.37 | (0.15, 0.92) |
70 → 219 | 2.76 | (1.61, 4.74) |
74 → 184 | 1.84 | (1.07, 3.17) |
118 → 219 | 1.62 | (0.83, 3.14) |
135 → 210 | 0.38 | (0.25, 0.59) |
142 → 67 | 1.89 | (1.13, 3.16) |
162 → 70 | 1.89 | (1.08, 3.31) |
179 → 103 | 1.98 | (0.97, 4.02) |
184 → 181 | 1.92 | (1.13, 3.27) |
184 → 190 | 0.73 | (0.39, 1.39) |
196 → 103 | 1.87 | (1.14, 3.05) |
196 → 190 | 1.90 | (0.92, 3.92) |
196 → 210 | 0.47 | (0.24, 0.93) |
200 → 190 | 1.76 | (0.92, 3.35) |
210 → 70 | 0.12 | (0.04, 0.34) |
211 → 210 | 0.46 | (0.31, 0.68) |
214 → 69 | 2.69 | (1.44, 5.03) |
215 → 41 | 3.12 | (2.05, 4.75) |
Estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence bounds for pathways leading from commonly mutant locations to locations with known association to RTI resistance. Slight discrepancies in estimated hazard ratios between this table and Table 4 are due to a different choice of regressors used to fit the model. Estimation was done using the survival [24] package of the R software environment [22].