Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2012 Jun;21(5):302–312. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820d7e6a

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Illustration of how the classification data were managed (□ = Glaucoma, ○ =Normal). The total sample was divided into training and test subsets (75% / 25%). The Training data (n=206/275) were further stratified into 10 equal partitions. Nine partitions were used to induce a classification tree while the 10th partition (validation) was held-out to evaluation performance of the induced decision tree. For each of 10 iterations, the validation partition was swapped with a new partition and another decision tree was induced and then validated. The final best classifier was then evaluated on the previously unused test subset (n = 69/275).