Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 14;17(30):3518–3525. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i30.3518

Table 4.

Gastric cancer screening prevalence by education level, age and income subgroups

Controls (n = 2842) Non-gastric cancer relatives (n = 454) Gastric cancer relatives (n = 261)
Education level
Elementary
n (%) 322 (29.2) 37 (32.5) 27 (35.1)
aOR (95% CI)1 1 (referent) 0.93 (0.57, 1.51) 1.59 (0.85, 2.96)
Middle and higher
n (%) 572 (34.3) 125 (38.9) 73 (41)
aOR (95% CI)1 1 (referent) 1.13 (0.82, 1.55) 1.36 (0.97, 1.92)
Age group (yr)
40-59
n (% 585 (34.5) 118 (37.7) 78 (42.4)
aOR (95% CI)1 1 (referent) 1.11 (0.82, 1.49) 1.53 (1.07, 2.17)a
≥ 60
n (%) 309 (28.8) 44 (36.1) 22 (31)
aOR (95% CI)1 1 (referent) 0.99 (0.57, 1.69) 1.08 (0.59, 1.98)
Income (US $/mo)
< 1000
n (%) 214 (27.1) 22 (26.2) 8 (17)
aOR (95% CI)1 1 (referent) 0.86 (0.47, 1.57) 0.70 (0.28, 1.77)
1000-5000
n (%) 580 (32.8) 113 (37.7) 79 (41.8)
aOR (95% CI)1 1 (referent) 1.16 (0.84, 1.60) 1.56 (1.10, 2.21)a
≥ 5000
n (%) 100 (47.4) 27 (53.0) 13 (68.4)
aOR (95% CI)1 1 (referent) 1.02 (0.46, 2.26) 2.70 (0.82, 8.88)
a

P < 0.05.

1

Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated via multiple logistic regression.