Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 1;85(3):442–445. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0368

Table 1.

Identity matrices for small, medium, and large segment open reading frames of Tahyna virus isolates from China compared with those of prototype Bardos 92 and variant Lumbo Tahyna virus strains*

Genome segment and strain % Nucleotide and amino acid sequence identities
XJ0708 XJ0625 XJ0710 Bardos 92 Lumbo
Small
XJ0708 99.2 99.3 92.5 90.5
XJ0625 100 99.6 91.8 90.5
XJ0710 100 100 91.9 90.5
Bardos 92 97.4 97.4 97.4 89
Lumbo 96.6 96.6 96.6 95.7
Medium
XJ0708 80.8 80.9 80.5 79.7
XJ0625 92.6 96.2 81.9 79.4
XJ0710 92.8 99 82.2 79.9
Bardos 92 92.6 94 94.2 80.8
Lumbo 89.1 89.1 89.3 89.1
Large
XJ0708 97.4 96.8 82.6
XJ0625 99.5 96.7 82.9
XJ0710 99.7 99.7 83.1
Bardos 92 97.1 97.1 97.3
*

% nucleotide sequence identities are shown above the diagonal, and % amino acid sequence identities are shown below the diagonal for each matrix. Values in bold represent comparisons between isolate XJ0708 from China and other Tahyna virus strains.

Compared regions include the nucleocapsid protein, the entire polyprotein open reading frame (Gn and Gc), and the polymerase open reading frame for the small, medium, and large segments, respectively.

Large segment data were not available for the Tahyna virus variant Lumbo strain.