Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 1;85(3):518–523. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0720

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics from a cluster-randomized clinical trial in Ethiopia comparing intensive latrine promotion with no latrine intervention*

Characteristic Latrine promotion Control
No. Proportion (95% CI) No. Proportion (95% CI)
Total population ≥ 1 year of age 16,370 18,682
Female 8,253 50.4% (49.6–51.2) 9,278 49.7% (49.0–50.4)
Received oral azithromycin 13,943 85.2% (82.4–87.9) 17,190 92.0% (89.9–94.2)
Ages 1–5 years 2,578 2,929
Female 1,288 50.0% (48.2–51.7) 1,461 49.9% (47.8–52.0)
Received oral azithromycin 2,160 83.8% (80.4–87.2) 2,754 94.0% (91.6–96.4)
Ages 6–10 years 3,074 3,686
Female 1,589 51.7% (49.5–53.9) 1,794 48.7% (47.1–50.2)
Received oral azithromycin 2,798 91.0% (88.2–93.9) 3.521 95.5% (93.5–97.6)
Ages 11–20 years 4,111 4,577
Female 2,101 51.1% (49.7–52.5) 2,281 49.8% (48.3–51.3)
Received oral azithromycin 3,449 83.9% (81.6–86.2) 4,142 90.5% (88.3–92.6)
Ages > 20 years 6,607 7,490
Female 3,275 49.6% (48.3–50.8) 3,742 50.0% (48.6–51.3)
Received oral azithromycin 5,536 83.8% (79.1–88.4) 6,773 90.4% (87.9–92.9)
*

No. = number of persons; CI = confidence interval.