Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 31;6(8):e24287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024287

Figure 3. Analysis of SAM docking poses generated by MedusaDock and Glide.

Figure 3

(A) Comparison of MedusaDock-generated structures of SAM versus the lowest energy pose of SAM obtained by MedusaDock. The lowest energy pose for SAM is considered the conformation that initially binds to apo-COMT. (B) Comparison of MedusaDock-generated structures of SAM versus the crystal structure of SAM within the holo-COMT complex. The lowest energy pose shown in this plot corresponds to the conformations depicted in Figure 2D,E. (C) Comparison of Glide generated structures of SAM versus the lowest energy pose of SAM obtained by MedusaDock. The inset shows an alignment between the lowest energy poses obtained by Glide (purple) and MedusaDock (cyan); RMSD  = 1.9 Å.