Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;66(9):1615–1619. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000900019

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Response latency of the trained STZ-induced diabetic (HT, n = 11), sedentary STZ-induced diabetic (HS, n = 9), normoglycemic trained (NT, n = 14) and normoglycemic sedentary (NS, n = 16) groups. The Kruskal Wallis test was used. *p<0.01: different from NS and NT; #p<0.05: different from HS.