Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2011 Sep;30(5):615–632. doi: 10.1037/a0023480

Table 2.

Studies reporting associations between mastery and measures of psychoneuroendocrine stress systems.

Study Participants Design Mastery
Construct
Mastery Measure CVD Outcome Results/Findings Effect Size
(Cohen’s d)
Cohen et al., 2006 781 men and
women from a
multi-site sample,
ages 33-45 years
Cross-
sectional
Personal
Mastery
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale
Diurnal cortisol
patterns
Mastery was negatively correlated
with diurnal cortisol slope.
Mastery partially mediated the
relationship between SES and
cortisol in combination with other
psychosocial variables and health
practices (Low SES was
associated with higher cortisol via
low mastery).
d = −.24
Cottington et al., 1985 444 men and
women from a
probability sample
of the adult
population of the
state of Michigan,
ages 18-96
Cross-
sectional
Confidence
/control
Scale developed for
this study reflecting
the level of self-
confidence one has in
general and in terms of
one’s ability to
manage problems,
control life
circumstances, and be
stimulated by and
enjoy competition
Blood pressure For normotensive men, but not
women, mastery was negatively
associated with systolic and
diastolic blood pressure.
For Men:
d = −.17
(systolic)
d = −.21
(diastolic)

For Women:
d = −.10
(systolic)
d = .06
(diastolic)
Gerritsen et al., 2009 1,150 older adults
from the
Longitudinal Aging
Study Amsterdam
(LASA), mean age
75 ± 7
Cross-
sectional
Personal
Mastery
5 of the 7 items of the
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale
Awakening and
evening cortisol
patterns and diurnal
cortisol variability
Mastery was unassociated with all
cortisol measures.
Awakening:
d = .10

Evening:
d = −.04

Diurnal
Variability:
d = .07
Light et al., 2004 25 recent mothers
without history of
drug-exposure
during pregnancy or
postpartum (age
29±1 years) and 10
recent mothers
reporting cocaine
use during
pregnancy (age
30±2 years);
participants were
free of CVD
Cross-
sectional
Personal
Mastery
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale
Resting and post-acute
stressor measurements
of blood pressure,
plasma norepinephrine,
plasma epinephrine,
and plasma oxytocin;
serum cortisol as well
as urinary cortisol and
catecholamines were
also collected.
Oxytocin at baseline and during
the stressor task were positively
associated with mastery in both
groups. Mastery was
unassociated with other
biomarkers.
Oxytocin:
d = .85
(baseline)
d = .70 (post-
speech)

Insufficient
information
to calculate
effect size for
other
biomarkers
Mausbach, Mills et al, 2007 106 elderly spousal
Alzheimer’s disease
caregivers, age ≥ 55
years
Cross-
sectional
Personal
Mastery
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale
β2-adrenergic receptor
sensitivity on
peripheral
mononuclear cells
Mastery was positively associated
with receptor sensitivity. Mastery
significantly mediated some of
the relationship between caregiver
burden and receptor sensitivity
d = .58
Mausbach, Aschbacher et al., 2008 115 elderly spousal
Alzheimer’s disease
caregivers, age ≥ 55
years
Prospective,
annual
assessments
for 5 years
Personal
Mastery
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale
β2-adrenergic receptor
sensitivity on
peripheral
mononuclear cells
Caregivers had age-independent
decreases in β2-adrenergic
receptor sensitivity. Decreases in
mastery over time were
associated with decreased
sensitivity.
d = .34
Roepke et al., In Press 87 elderly spousal
Alzheimer’s disease
caregivers and 43
non-caregiving
controls, age ≥ 55
years
Cross-
sectional
Personal
Mastery
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale
Allostatic load index
including the following
indicators: systolic
blood pressure,
diastolic blood
pressure, BMI,
total/HDL cholesterol
ratio, HDL cholesterol,
plasma norepinephrine,
and plasma
epinephrine
Caregivers had higher allostatic
load compared to non-caregiving
controls. Mastery moderated the
relationship between caregiving
status and allostatic load, such
that caregivers had significantly
higher allostatic load compared to
controls when mastery was high,
but not when mastery was low.
d = .38
van Santen et al., 2011 381 men and
women with and
without psychiatric
diagnoses from the
Netherlands Study
of Depression and
Anxiety (NESDA),
ages 18-65
Cross-
sectional
Personal
Mastery
5 of the 7 items of the
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale
Cortisol awakening
curve
Mastery was marginally
associated with the dynamic of
the cortisol awakening response
(CAR). Specifically, higher
mastery was associated with
flatter CAR. Mastery was
unassociated with the total
cortisol secretion in the first hour
after awakening.
d = −.20
(dynamic of
the CARE)

d = .12 (total
cortisol
secretion in
the first hour)
Younger et al., 2008 73 men and women
with rheumatoid
arthritis, ages of 23-
81
Prospective
laboratory
study
Personal
Mastery
Pearlin and Schooler
Mastery Scale; items
were divided into 2
components: fatalism
and control
Resting blood pressure
and blood pressure
reactivity to laboratory
stressor tasks
Those scoring high on the control
component had lower mean
arterial pressure (MAP) at rest
compared to those with low
control. However, those with
high control also exhibited higher
blood pressure reactivity to stress
compared to those with low
control.
d = −.65
(resting
MAP)

d = .94
(MAP
reactivity to
stress)

Note. BMI = body mass index; CVD = cardiovascular disease; HDL = high density lipoprotein; MAP = mean arterial pressure; SES = socioeconomic status