Table 2.
Studies reporting associations between mastery and measures of psychoneuroendocrine stress systems.
Study | Participants | Design | Mastery Construct |
Mastery Measure | CVD Outcome | Results/Findings | Effect Size (Cohen’s d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cohen et al., 2006 | 781 men and women from a multi-site sample, ages 33-45 years |
Cross- sectional |
Personal Mastery |
Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale |
Diurnal cortisol patterns |
Mastery was negatively correlated with diurnal cortisol slope. Mastery partially mediated the relationship between SES and cortisol in combination with other psychosocial variables and health practices (Low SES was associated with higher cortisol via low mastery). |
d = −.24 |
Cottington et al., 1985 | 444 men and women from a probability sample of the adult population of the state of Michigan, ages 18-96 |
Cross- sectional |
Confidence /control |
Scale developed for this study reflecting the level of self- confidence one has in general and in terms of one’s ability to manage problems, control life circumstances, and be stimulated by and enjoy competition |
Blood pressure | For normotensive men, but not women, mastery was negatively associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure. |
For Men: d = −.17 (systolic) d = −.21 (diastolic) For Women: d = −.10 (systolic) d = .06 (diastolic) |
Gerritsen et al., 2009 | 1,150 older adults from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), mean age 75 ± 7 |
Cross- sectional |
Personal Mastery |
5 of the 7 items of the Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale |
Awakening and evening cortisol patterns and diurnal cortisol variability |
Mastery was unassociated with all cortisol measures. |
Awakening: d = .10 Evening: d = −.04 Diurnal Variability: d = .07 |
Light et al., 2004 | 25 recent mothers without history of drug-exposure during pregnancy or postpartum (age 29±1 years) and 10 recent mothers reporting cocaine use during pregnancy (age 30±2 years); participants were free of CVD |
Cross- sectional |
Personal Mastery |
Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale |
Resting and post-acute stressor measurements of blood pressure, plasma norepinephrine, plasma epinephrine, and plasma oxytocin; serum cortisol as well as urinary cortisol and catecholamines were also collected. |
Oxytocin at baseline and during the stressor task were positively associated with mastery in both groups. Mastery was unassociated with other biomarkers. |
Oxytocin: d = .85 (baseline) d = .70 (post- speech) Insufficient information to calculate effect size for other biomarkers |
Mausbach, Mills et al, 2007 | 106 elderly spousal Alzheimer’s disease caregivers, age ≥ 55 years |
Cross- sectional |
Personal Mastery |
Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale |
β2-adrenergic receptor sensitivity on peripheral mononuclear cells |
Mastery was positively associated with receptor sensitivity. Mastery significantly mediated some of the relationship between caregiver burden and receptor sensitivity |
d = .58 |
Mausbach, Aschbacher et al., 2008 | 115 elderly spousal Alzheimer’s disease caregivers, age ≥ 55 years |
Prospective, annual assessments for 5 years |
Personal Mastery |
Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale |
β2-adrenergic receptor sensitivity on peripheral mononuclear cells |
Caregivers had age-independent decreases in β2-adrenergic receptor sensitivity. Decreases in mastery over time were associated with decreased sensitivity. |
d = .34 |
Roepke et al., In Press | 87 elderly spousal Alzheimer’s disease caregivers and 43 non-caregiving controls, age ≥ 55 years |
Cross- sectional |
Personal Mastery |
Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale |
Allostatic load index including the following indicators: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, BMI, total/HDL cholesterol ratio, HDL cholesterol, plasma norepinephrine, and plasma epinephrine |
Caregivers had higher allostatic load compared to non-caregiving controls. Mastery moderated the relationship between caregiving status and allostatic load, such that caregivers had significantly higher allostatic load compared to controls when mastery was high, but not when mastery was low. |
d = .38 |
van Santen et al., 2011 | 381 men and women with and without psychiatric diagnoses from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), ages 18-65 |
Cross- sectional |
Personal Mastery |
5 of the 7 items of the Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale |
Cortisol awakening curve |
Mastery was marginally associated with the dynamic of the cortisol awakening response (CAR). Specifically, higher mastery was associated with flatter CAR. Mastery was unassociated with the total cortisol secretion in the first hour after awakening. |
d = −.20 (dynamic of the CARE) d = .12 (total cortisol secretion in the first hour) |
Younger et al., 2008 | 73 men and women with rheumatoid arthritis, ages of 23- 81 |
Prospective laboratory study |
Personal Mastery |
Pearlin and Schooler Mastery Scale; items were divided into 2 components: fatalism and control |
Resting blood pressure and blood pressure reactivity to laboratory stressor tasks |
Those scoring high on the control component had lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) at rest compared to those with low control. However, those with high control also exhibited higher blood pressure reactivity to stress compared to those with low control. |
d = −.65 (resting MAP) d = .94 (MAP reactivity to stress) |
Note. BMI = body mass index; CVD = cardiovascular disease; HDL = high density lipoprotein; MAP = mean arterial pressure; SES = socioeconomic status