Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 26;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-6-21

Table 2.

Estimates of lung function according to radiological findings.

Overall Studies with X-ray Studies with (HR)CT

n Estimate 95% CI I2 (%) n Estimate 95% CI I2 (%) n Estimate 95% CI I2 (%)
FVC (% predicted)
 Normal imaging 15 95.7 93.9-97.3 94.8 9 94.9 92.9-96.9 96.2 6 97.1 94.2-100.1 89.1
 Pleural fibrosis 14 89.0 86.5-91.5 96.1 8 87.1 83.9-90.4 89.5 6 91.6 87.8-95.4 96.8
 Asbestosis 20 86.5 83.7-89.4 98.2 10 84.8 80.8-88.8 98.9 10 88.5 84.3-92.7 95.8
FEV1 (% predicted)
 Normal imaging 14 93.6 90.6-96.5 97.3 8 91.4 87.7-95.1 98.0 6 97.4 92.5-102.2 64.7
 Pleural fibrosis 11 89.2 84.7-93.7 93.7 5 83.9 77.2-90.5 42.0 6 93.7 87.6-99.9 95.8
 Asbestosis 17 85.7 80.6-90.7 98.8 7 85.5 77.8-93.1 99.5 10 85.8 79.2-92.5 80.8
FEV1/FVC (% predicted)
 Normal imaging 3 96.4 94.3-98.5 86.9 2 97.4 92.5-102.2 64.7 1 94.9 86.8-103.0 -
 Pleural fibrosis 5 95.4 92.7-98.1 68.7 2 93.7 87.6-99.9 95.8 3 96.3 92.6-100.1 68.1
 Asbestosis 8 95.5 94.1-96.9 83.8 3 85.8 79.2-92.5 80.8 5 97.0 95.7-98.3 0.0

Comparison of imaging procedure.

Estimates for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the ratio of both parameters (FEV1/FVC) for each radiological subgroup. Results are shown for all included studies as well as separated according to the radiological method used for the diagnosis (conventional chest X-ray or (high resolution) computed tomography. Estimates are expressed as percent predicted together with confidence interval (CI) and I2 as a measure of heterogeneity, n = number of studies included in each subgroup.