Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Couns Psychol. 2009 Apr;56(2):239–252. doi: 10.1037/a0015432

Table 3.

Multinomial Logistic Regression 1 (Diversity Attitudes Predicting PCRW Types at Entrance) and Multinomial Logistic Regression 2 (PCRW Types at Entrance Predicting Interracial Friends Time 2)

Unaware of Privilege Odds Ratio (95% CI) UDO Odds Ratio (95% CI) Interracial friends Time 2 Odds Ratio (95% CI)
PCRW Types
EmpathicbutUnaccountableOblivious
3.52, (1.92, 6.46) 2.47, (1.18, 5.18)
EmpathicbutUnaccountableFearfulGuilt
1.58, (1.01, 2.46) 3.91, (2.11, 7.27) 4.59, (2.08, 10.10)
EmpathicbutUnaccountableInsensitiveandAfraid
26.22, (10.02, 68.61) 5.92, (2.15, 16.13)
AntiracistInsensitiveandAfraid
36.45, (12.46, 106.61) 3.13, (1.05, 9.36)
AntiracistFearfulGuilt
5.44, (2.54, 11.64)
AntiracistFearfulGuilt
4.89, (2.27, 10.55)
FearfulGuiltInsensitiveandAfraid
6.70, (2.76, 16.28)
ObliviousInsensitiveandAfraid
7.44, (3.12, 17.75)
ObliviousFearfulGuilt
2.27, (1.46, 3.52)
ObliviousAntiracist
3.03, (1.76, 5.22)
InsensitiveandAfraidEmpathicbutUnaccountable
1.92, (1.01, 3.64)
InsensitiveandAfraidAntiracist
4.05, (1.96, 8.40)
InsensitiveandAfraidFearfulGuilt
3.03, (1.61, 5.72)
EmpathicbutUnaccountableAntiracist
2.11, (1.27, 3.51)

Note. UDO = Miville-Guzman Universal Diverse Orientation Scale Short Form; Unaware of Privilege = Unawareness of Racial Privilege Subscale of Color-blind Racial Attitudes Scale-Short; T2 = Time 2; Odds > 1 are significant (p < .05) and indicate greater likelihood of being in the first type listed (e.g., unit increase in UDO relates to 4.89 times more likely to be in Antiracist than Oblivious. Any odds ratios not presented are non-significant.