Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Nov 1;46(3):283–290. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e31814b94e2

TABLE 2.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis of Adipose Tissue Associations With HOMA Level >4 in HIV-Positive Subjects and Controls*

Control HIV-Positive


HOMA >4 OR 95% CI P HOMA >4 OR 95% CI P
Upper trunk SAT
    Third vs. first tertile 61%   9.0 (2.4, 33.9) 0.001 57% 2.1 (1.36, 3.2) 0.001
    Second vs. first tertile 20%   2.4 (0.63, 9.1) 0.20 36% 1.21 (0.82, 1.78) 0.33
    First tertile (reference) 5% 27%
VAT
    Third vs. first tertile 63% 12.1 (3.2, 45.6) 0.0002 55% 3.1 (2.0, 4.8) <0.0001
    Second vs. first tertile 18%   1.94 (0.54, 6.9) 0.31 38% 1.90 (1.26, 2.8) 0.002
    First tertile (reference) 6% 22%

Excludes those currently on hypoglycemics or glucose ≥ 126.

*

Model also controls for ethnicity, age, gender, alcohol (HIV only), current crack or cocaine use (HIV only), physical activity (control only), and adequacy of food (controls only).

Prevalence (%) of HOMA >4.