Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Skin Res Technol. 2011 Apr 15;17(4):387–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00508.x

Figure 5. Comparison of length and viable epidermal thickness measurements between CSLM and histological methods.

Figure 5

Fig 5a) shows the comparison of length measurement between CSLM and histology methods. Fig 5b) shows the results of viable epidermal thickness measurement from both methods. Measurements n1 and n2 are determined from confocal and histology methods respectively. P values are representative of the t-test of measurements from these two methods.