Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Mar 30;155(1):64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2011.03.007

Table 1.

Experimental Animal Models of UV-induced melanomagenesis.

Model Organism Advantages Disadvantages
Monodelphis domestica (Gray short-tailed opossum) Marsupial; intermediate phylogenetic distance
Capable of photoreactivation; experimental removal of UV-induced DNA damage
Whole genome sequenced
Not amenable to inbreeding; outbreed stocks only
Dermal melanophores only, no epidermal melanocytes

Dissimilar histopathology to humans; melanoma of dermal origin only that rarely metastasize
HGF-SF mice Mammal; least phylogenetic distance
Excellent laboratory breeder; easy husbandry
Broad distribution of melanocytes; located in the dermis, dermal-epidermal junction, basal epidermis Similar histopathology to humans; dermal-epidermal melanomas and metastatic melanomas
Whole genome sequenced
Not capable of photoreactivation

Transgenic animal

Spontaneous melanomas are of dermal origin only; do not resemble the human condition
Sp-Couchianus backcross fish (Xiphophorus hybrid) Capable of photoreactivation

Easy to obtain and maintain large sample sizes for experimentation
Melanocytes found in the epidermis and at the dermal-epidermal junction
Similar histopathology to humans; dermal-epidermal melanomas and highly invasive melanomas
Well characterized genetics; including the involvement of RTKs and CDKs in melanomagenesis
Teleost fish; great phylogenetic distance
Internal fertilization; Not amenable to genetic manipulation
Whole genome not sequenced