. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 2.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2006 May 10;128(18):6101–6110. doi: 10.1021/ja054971w

Table 2.

RMSD Comparison^a of Trpzip4^b and HP5W4 Ensembles (Å)

region	trpzip4 vs HP5W4	trpzip4 vs GB1	HP5W4 vs GB1
backbone (3 – 14)	0.57 ± 0.09	1.25 ± 0.11	1.22 ± 0.15
turn backbone (T1 – T4)	0.23 ± 0.06	0.22 ± 0.05	0.14 ± 0.02
Cβ,Cγ (3,5,12,14) ^c	1.09 ± 0.14	1.33 ± 0.11	1.42 ± 0.11
indole rings (5,12) ^d	0.27 ± 0.07	n. a.	n. a.
indole rings (3,5,12,14) ^d	1.58 ± 0.42	n. a.	n. a.

RMSDs are pairwise over the complete ensembles and were calculated using MolMol.²³

PDB# 1LE3.

For GB1, 14Cγ is excluded since it is ambiguous when this residue is a valine.

The 9 heavy atoms of the indole rings.