Table 3.
Adjusted Disparities in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Fee-For-Service (FFS), by Vulnerability Characteristic†
Female (versus Male) | Hispanic (versus Non-Hispanic White) | Black (versus Non-Hispanic White) | Age 85 or Older | Less Than High Schoo lEducation | LIS Deemed Eligible | Fair/Poor General Health | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rate doctor | |||||||
Disparity within MA‡ | 1.16*** | 1.05*** | 0.24 | 0.11 | 1.35*** | 0.08 | −1.29*** |
Disparity within FFS‡ | 1.26*** | 1.01*** | −0.03 | −0.11 | 1.13*** | 0.65*** | −0.84*** |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS)§ | −0.10 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.21 | −0.57* | −0.45* |
Rate specialist | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 0.79*** | 0.29 | −1.79*** | −0.15 | 1.32*** | 0.48 | −1.18** |
Disparity within FFS | 1.12*** | 0.20 | −0.55 | −0.65 | 1.01*** | 0.11 | −1.02** |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.33 | 0.09 | −1.24* | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.37 | −0.16 |
Doctor communication | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 0.49** | 0.47 | 1.04*** | −0.33 | 0.74*** | 0.02 | −1.87 |
Disparity within FFS | 0.53*** | 1.00** | 1.07*** | −0.87** | 0.27 | 0.11 | −1.40 |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.04 | −0.53 | −0.03 | 0.54 | 0.47 | −0.09 | −0.48 |
Rate MA plan/Medicare (FFS) | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 1.43*** | 0.14 | −1.05*** | 1.68*** | 1.88*** | 1.86*** | −2.52*** |
Disparity within FFS | 2.16*** | 2.22*** | 0.11 | 2.68*** | 2.94*** | 4.09*** | 0.33 |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.73*** | −2.08*** | −1.16** | −1.00** | −1.06*** | −2.22*** | −2.84*** |
Rate care | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 1.13*** | −0.74* | −2.30*** | 0.19 | 0.81*** | 0.15 | −3.00*** |
Disparity within FFS | 1.63*** | −1.13** | −2.85*** | 0.49 | −0.11 | −0.24 | −2.33*** |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.50* | 0.39 | 0.55 | −0.29 | 0.92*** | 0.39 | −0.66** |
Getting needed care | |||||||
Disparity within MA | −0.47* | −1.83*** | −1.90*** | 0.37 | 1.47*** | −0.52 | −2.10*** |
Disparity within FFS | 0.07 | −1.11* | −1.40*** | 0.41 | 0.92*** | −0.18 | −0.56 |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.54* | −0.72 | −0.50 | −0.04 | 0.55 | −0.34 | −1.54*** |
Getting care quickly | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 1.04*** | −5.18*** | −4.01*** | −0.06 | −1.34*** | 0.06 | 0.15 |
Disparity within FFS | 0.96*** | −4.18*** | −2.27*** | 0.33 | −1.99*** | −0.42 | 1.40*** |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | 0.08 | −1.00 | −1.73* | −0.39 | 0.65 | 0.47 | −1.25*** |
Paperwork | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 0.41 | −4.52*** | −0.75 | −2.81* | −3.79*** | −1.90 | −2.96* |
Disparity within FFS | −0.08 | −2.96* | 0.76 | −0.01 | −4.46*** | −0.26 | −0.55 |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | 0.50 | −1.56 | −1.51 | −2.80* | 0.67 | −1.64 | −2.40** |
Rate PDP | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 1.61*** | 2.35*** | 1.26*** | 3.85*** | 2.34*** | 6.37*** | −2.21*** |
Disparity within FFS | 2.09*** | −1.32** | −0.08 | 3.41*** | 3.01*** | 9.47*** | −1.18*** |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.48 | 3.66*** | 1.33** | 0.43 | −0.67* | −3.10*** | −1.02*** |
PDP: getting Rx drugs | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 0.89*** | −2.05*** | −2.70*** | −0.49 | −0.78** | −0.15 | −0.97** |
Disparity within FFS | 1.33*** | −4.77*** | −2.91*** | 0.73* | 0.40* | 0.51** | −0.77** |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.44 | 2.72*** | 0.21 | −1.22** | −1.17*** | −0.66 | −0.20 |
PDP: getting information | |||||||
Disparity within MA | 0.45 | −3.52*** | −4.57*** | −0.03 | −1.61** | 1.18 | −2.86*** |
Disparity within FFS | 0.63 | −3.82*** | −1.43* | 2.49*** | −0.25 | 2.99*** | −1.46* |
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) | −0.18 | 0.30 | −3.15** | −2.52* | −1.37 | −1.81* | −1.40* |
Count of significant negative differences in disparities (MA–FFS) | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Count of significant positive differences in disparities (MA–FFS) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Each row represents a single model predicting a given outcome from all column subgroup indicators, and MA indicator, all subgroup by MA interactions, and additional covariates described above.
“Vulnerable”–“Less Vulnerable”, so a negative value reflects a less positive experience for the “vulnerable” beneficiaries than the less “vulnerable” beneficiaries.
A difference-of-differences such that a negative value reflects a negative disparity that is larger or a positive disparity that is smaller for “vulnerable” beneficiaries in MA when compared with FFS.
p<0.05
p<0.01
p<0.001.
LIS, low-income subsidy.