Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug;46(4):1039–1058. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01245.x

Table 3.

Adjusted Disparities in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Fee-For-Service (FFS), by Vulnerability Characteristic

Female (versus Male) Hispanic (versus Non-Hispanic White) Black (versus Non-Hispanic White) Age 85 or Older Less Than High Schoo lEducation LIS Deemed Eligible Fair/Poor General Health
Rate doctor
 Disparity within MA 1.16*** 1.05*** 0.24 0.11 1.35*** 0.08 −1.29***
 Disparity within FFS 1.26*** 1.01*** −0.03 −0.11 1.13*** 0.65*** −0.84***
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS)§ −0.10 0.04 0.27 0.21 0.21 −0.57* −0.45*
Rate specialist
 Disparity within MA 0.79*** 0.29 −1.79*** −0.15 1.32*** 0.48 −1.18**
 Disparity within FFS 1.12*** 0.20 −0.55 −0.65 1.01*** 0.11 −1.02**
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.33 0.09 −1.24* 0.50 0.31 0.37 −0.16
Doctor communication
 Disparity within MA 0.49** 0.47 1.04*** −0.33 0.74*** 0.02 −1.87
 Disparity within FFS 0.53*** 1.00** 1.07*** −0.87** 0.27 0.11 −1.40
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.04 −0.53 −0.03 0.54 0.47 −0.09 −0.48
Rate MA plan/Medicare (FFS)
 Disparity within MA 1.43*** 0.14 −1.05*** 1.68*** 1.88*** 1.86*** −2.52***
 Disparity within FFS 2.16*** 2.22*** 0.11 2.68*** 2.94*** 4.09*** 0.33
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.73*** −2.08*** −1.16** −1.00** −1.06*** −2.22*** −2.84***
Rate care
 Disparity within MA 1.13*** −0.74* −2.30*** 0.19 0.81*** 0.15 −3.00***
 Disparity within FFS 1.63*** −1.13** −2.85*** 0.49 −0.11 −0.24 −2.33***
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.50* 0.39 0.55 −0.29 0.92*** 0.39 −0.66**
Getting needed care
 Disparity within MA −0.47* −1.83*** −1.90*** 0.37 1.47*** −0.52 −2.10***
 Disparity within FFS 0.07 −1.11* −1.40*** 0.41 0.92*** −0.18 −0.56
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.54* −0.72 −0.50 −0.04 0.55 −0.34 −1.54***
Getting care quickly
 Disparity within MA 1.04*** −5.18*** −4.01*** −0.06 −1.34*** 0.06 0.15
 Disparity within FFS 0.96*** −4.18*** −2.27*** 0.33 −1.99*** −0.42 1.40***
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) 0.08 −1.00 −1.73* −0.39 0.65 0.47 −1.25***
Paperwork
 Disparity within MA 0.41 −4.52*** −0.75 −2.81* −3.79*** −1.90 −2.96*
 Disparity within FFS −0.08 −2.96* 0.76 −0.01 −4.46*** −0.26 −0.55
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) 0.50 −1.56 −1.51 −2.80* 0.67 −1.64 −2.40**
Rate PDP
 Disparity within MA 1.61*** 2.35*** 1.26*** 3.85*** 2.34*** 6.37*** −2.21***
 Disparity within FFS 2.09*** −1.32** −0.08 3.41*** 3.01*** 9.47*** −1.18***
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.48 3.66*** 1.33** 0.43 −0.67* −3.10*** −1.02***
PDP: getting Rx drugs
 Disparity within MA 0.89*** −2.05*** −2.70*** −0.49 −0.78** −0.15 −0.97**
 Disparity within FFS 1.33*** −4.77*** −2.91*** 0.73* 0.40* 0.51** −0.77**
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.44 2.72*** 0.21 −1.22** −1.17*** −0.66 −0.20
PDP: getting information
 Disparity within MA 0.45 −3.52*** −4.57*** −0.03 −1.61** 1.18 −2.86***
 Disparity within FFS 0.63 −3.82*** −1.43* 2.49*** −0.25 2.99*** −1.46*
Difference in disparities (MA–FFS) −0.18 0.30 −3.15** −2.52* −1.37 −1.81* −1.40*
Count of significant negative differences in disparities (MA–FFS) 3 1 4 4 3 4 8
Count of significant positive differences in disparities (MA–FFS) 0 2 1 0 1 0 0

Each row represents a single model predicting a given outcome from all column subgroup indicators, and MA indicator, all subgroup by MA interactions, and additional covariates described above.

“Vulnerable”–“Less Vulnerable”, so a negative value reflects a less positive experience for the “vulnerable” beneficiaries than the less “vulnerable” beneficiaries.

§

A difference-of-differences such that a negative value reflects a negative disparity that is larger or a positive disparity that is smaller for “vulnerable” beneficiaries in MA when compared with FFS.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001.

LIS, low-income subsidy.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure