Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug;77(16):5822–5825. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05228-11

Table 1.

Comparison of cellobiose-galactose cofermentation result with sole-carbon-source fermentation by engineered S. cerevisiae (D452-2BT)a

Added sugar (concn) for fermentation expt OD (A600) EtOH concn (g/liter) EtOH yield (g/g) Vol PEtOH (g ethanol/liter·h) Sp. PEtOH (g ethanol/g cell·h)
Cellobiose (40 g/liter) 18 ± 0.59 13 ± 0.30 0.34 ± 0.01 0.37 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.02
Galactose (40 g/liter) 14 ± 0.06 14 ± 0.12 0.36 ± 0.01 0.61 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.02
Cellobiose (20 g/liter) + galactose (20 g/liter) 12 ± 1.02 13 ± 0.80 0.35 ± 0.02 0.59 ± 0.04 0.32 ± 0.01
Cellobiose (40 g/liter) + galactose (40 g/liter) 23 ± 0.20 27 ± 0.04 0.36 ± 0.01 0.75 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.02
Glucose (40 g/liter) + galactose (40 g/liter) 14 ± 0.04 21 ± 0.93 0.34 ± 0.01 0.58 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.02
a

Vol PEtOH and Sp. PEtOH denote volumetric ethanol (EtOH) productivity and specific EtOH productivity, respectively. All values are the means of results of two independent fermentations; errors represent the standard deviations of results between two fermentations. Sp. PEtOH was calculated during the period from 0 to 24 h of each fermentation.