Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;55(9):4019–4027. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00334-11

Table 2.

Phenotypic characterization of recombinant HCMV pUL54 mutants and predicted enzyme structural changes

Strain or recombinant mutant (selectiona) UL54 conserved region GCV
CDV
FOS
Protein stability analyses
EC50b (μM) Ratioc EC50 (μM) Ratio EC50 (μM) Ratio Predicted ΔΔGd (kcal/mol) Domain involved
AD169 0.91 (0.72–1.10) 1.1 0.099 (0.079–0.119) 1.1 21.6 (15.1–28.1) 0.9
RvHB5e 0.81 (0.56–1.07) 1.0 0.085 (0.081–0.088) 0.9 17.8 (10.9–24.6) 0.7
RvHBWTf 0.82 (0.60–1.04) 0.094 (0.076–0.112) 24.3 (16.6–32.1)
Mutations selected with GCV-1 (from a clinical strain)
    488R (10) IV-δC 2.84 (2.45–3.23) 3.5 0.739 (0.622–0.857) 7.9 15.2 (9.8–20.5) 0.6 3.24 (S) Exo
    539R (10) δC (Exo III) 2.60 (2.08–3.12) 3.2 1.247 (1.037–1.456) 13.3 15.9 (10.1–21.7) 0.7 −3.75 (D) Exo
    595I (25) δC-II 1.10 (0.73–1.47) 1.3 0.109 (0.082–0.137) 1.2 47.8 (34.2–61.4) 2.0 5.05 (S) N terminal
    787L (1,000) VI 1.50 (1.14–1.86) 1.8 0.082 (0.049–0.115) 0.9 58.3 (35.3–81.3) 2.4 2.06 (S) Pol
    862F (1,000) III-I 1.40 (1.14–1.65) 1.7 0.080 (0.057–0.104) 0.9 27.2 (23.5–30.9) 1.1 NIg NI
    946L (1,000) I-VII 0.93 (0.60–1.26) 1.1 0.086 (0.053–0.118) 0.9 57.9 (34.1–81.7) 2.4 2.49 (S) Pol
Mutations selected with GCV-2 (from laboratory strain AD169)
    545S (10) δC (Exo III) 4.13 (3.02–5.24) 5.0 1.113 (0.917–1.308) 11.9 24.3 (16.6–32.0) 1.0 1.5 (S) Exo
    812L (1,000) III 2.14 (1.39–2.89) 2.6 0.190 (0.162–0.217) 2.0 20.6 (19.6–21.5) 0.8 0.51 (S) Pol
    829S (300) III 1.68 (1.20–2.16) 2.0 0.148 (0.118–0.177) 1.6 27.2 (21.4–33.0) 1.1 1.25 (S) Pol
    879G (1,000) III-I 1.02 (0.64–1.39) 1.2 0.086 (0.061–0.110) 0.9 21.7 (16.9–26.5) 0.9 NI NI
    545S + 829S 5.98 (2.82–9.14) 7.3 0.424 (0.350–0.498) 4.5 44.7 (33.4–56.0) 1.8
Mutations selected with FOS-1 (from laboratory strain AD169)
    408D (800) IV (Exo II) 3.33 (2.46–4.19) 4.0 0.392 (0.342–0.442) 4.2 31.5 (18.7–44.2) 1.3 2.31 (S) Exo
    552N (300) δC 1.53 (1.14–1.92) 1.9 0.110 (0.072–0.149) 1.2 63.0 (35.2–90.9) 2.6 −0.17 (D) Exo
    957F (3,000) I-VII 2.20 (1.33–3.06) 2.7 0.128 (0.089–0.166) 1.4 31.8 (20.5–43.1) 1.3 −0.2 (D) Pol
    408D + 552N 3.45 (2.55–4.36) 4.2 0.181 (0.120–0.243) 1.9 97.3 (60.4–134.2) 4.0
    408D + 957F 4.05 (2.47–5.62) 4.9 0.420 (0.318–0.522) 4.5 81.5 (79.2–83.7) 3.3
    552N + 957F 1.30 (1.04–1.56) 1.6 0.088 (0.050–0.125) 0.9 134.1 (97.8–170) 5.5
Mutations selected with FOS-2 (from laboratory strain AD169)
    500N (300) δC 2.61 (2.32–2.90) 3.2 0.284 (0.227–0.341) 3.0 29.3 (24.1–34.4) 1.2 −0.5 (D) Exo
    585A (300) δC 1.24 (0.83–1.66) 1.5 0.133 (0.115–0.150) 1.4 65.1 (50.0–80.3) 2.7 −1.03 (D) Exo
    757K (3,000) II-VI 0.92 (0.57–1.26) 1.3 0.076 (0.048–0.103) 0.8 32.5 (18.9–46.0) 1.3 1.11 (S) Pol
    802 Mh VI-III 1.39 (1.14–1.64) 1.7 0.090 (0.070–0.110) 1.0 65.7 (45.2–86.2) 2.7 0.02 (S) Pol
    802V (800) VI-III 1.46 (1.15–1.76) 1.8 0.105 (0.087–0.124) 1.1 22.8 (15.4–30.2) 0.9 −0.7 (D) Pol
    926V (3,000) I-VII 1.11 (0.94–1.28) 1.3 0.107 (0.066–0.147) 1.1 22.7 (13.9–31.5) 0.9 1.49 (S) Pol
    500N + 585A 1.95 (1.34–2.56) 2.4 0.227 (0.165–0.288) 2.4 66.5 (44.2–88.8) 2.7
a

Selection refers to the concentration (in μM) of the selection agent at which the mutation was first detected.

b

EC50s were determined using the LRA previously described (29). Results represent mean values of at least 3 independent experiments. Values in parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals.

c

Ratios express the EC50 for the recombinant mutant/EC50 for the wild-type recombinant. Ratios indicated in boldface type indicate a significant change (i.e., ratio of at least 1.7 combined with statistical significance).

d

The predicted effect on domain stability was evaluated using the program CUPSAT (45). Effects on structure are indicated in parentheses, with mutations classified as having either a stabilizing (S) or a destabilizing (D) effect on the domain structure (see Materials and Methods).

e

RvHB5 is the virus reconstituted from the original (unmodified) HCMV/BAC pHB5 (9).

f

RvHBWT is the wild-type virus reconstituted using our system (i.e., with the residual FRT motif).

g

NI, not included in the 3D model.

h

Mutation L802M was included as a comparison for mutation L802V identified in our studies.