Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;55(9):4134–4143. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00482-11

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

HTS assay for inhibitors of bacterial motility. (A) Dose-response evaluation of phenamil (■) and tetracycline (▴) for motility inhibition in 384-well plates, measured by the OD615. (B) Dose-response evaluation of phenamil (■) and tetracycline (▴) for toxicity in 384-well plates, measured with alamarBlue. In each case, the data are expressed as percent inhibition relative to the OD615 reading or alamarBlue fluorescence signal in the absence of compound. (C) Sample plate. Plates were inoculated with the motile strain C7258. Columns 1 and 2 contained phenamil (rows 1 to 4) or tetracycline (rows 5 to 16). Compounds that specifically inhibit motility (phenamil-like) without affecting viability can be distinguished from those with bactericidal activity (Tet-like) in this plate. Compounds such as phenamil, which inhibits motility but not viability, yield a bright (pink) alamarBlue fluorescence signal (column 8, row 5); compounds that do not affect motility or viability yield a blurred alamarBlue signal due to bacterial spreading across the well; and bactericidal compounds yield a Tet-like (blue) alamarBlue signal (column 8, row 3).