Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;55(9):4103–4113. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00294-11

Table 1.

Mutations and antiviral phenotype of replicons obtained following culturing in the presence of BILN 2061a using various selection protocols

Antiviral pressure (fold EC50) Fold increaseb compared to WT EC50 ± SDb (μM) NS3 mutation(s) (aa 22-336)c Critical phased
1 2 0.033 ± 0.008 S174S/C N
2 16 0.24 ± 0.08 D168D/E/V, S174S/C N
5 13 0.19 ± 0.09 D168D/E/V, S174S/C N
25 67 1 ± 0.4 D168V, E176E/G Y
125 200 3 ± 0.5 D168V, S174S/C, E176E/G Y
2-5 17 0.26 ± 0.007 D168D/E/V, S174S/C N
2-25 61 0.92 ± 0.3 D168V, S174S/C, E176E/G N
2-125 133 2 ± 0.2 D168V, S174S/C, E176E/G N
5-25 56 0.84 ± 0.005 D168D/V, S174S/C, E176E/G N
5-125 133 2 ± 0.6 D168V, S174S/C, E176E/G N
25-125 133 2 ± 0.3 D168V N
2-5-25 133 2 ± 0.6 D168V, S174S/C N
2-5-125 133 2 ± 0.6 D168V, S174S/C N
2-25-125 133 2 ± 0.5 D168V, S174S/C, S280S/A N
5-25-125 200 3 ± 0.04 D168V, S174S/C, E176E/G, S280S/A N
2-5-25-125 267 4 ± 0.7 D168V, S174S/C N
a

EC50, 0.015 ± 0.01 μM; CC50, 22.6 ± 0.1 μM.

b

Data are mean values for 2 independent determinations of the antiviral phenotype.

c

Major resistance mutations are indicated in boldface. aa, amino acids.

d

Y, yes; N, no.