Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;55(9):4050–4057. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00159-11

Table 3.

Comparison of oseltamivir (OS) and oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) concentrations when oseltamivir was administered alone (regimen B) or together with zanamivir (regimens C and D)a

Drug and pharmacokinetic parameter C:B
D:B
Ratio (95% CI) Bioequivalence CIb Ratio (95% CI) Bioequivalence CIb
OC
    AUC0-12 0.969 (0.940−0.999) 94.4–99.5 0.989 (0.960−1.020) 96.4–101.5
    AUC0-∞ 0.982 (0.932−1.035) 93.8–102.8 0.977 (0.927−1.030) 93.3–102.2
    Cmax 1.005 (0.958−1.055) 96.4–104.8 1.025 (0.977−1.075) 98.3–106.8
OS
    AUC0-12 0.996 (0.932−1.064) 94.0–105.5 1.008 (0.943−1.078) 95.2–106.8
    AUC0-∞ 1.019 (0.952−1.090) 96.0–108.0 1.022 (0.955−1.094) 96.4–108.4
    Cmax 0.938 (0.743−1.185) 76.6–114.8 1.073 (0.850−1.355) 87.7–131.3
a

AUC0-∞, area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity; AUC0-12, area under the concentration-time curve between 0 and 12 h; Cmax, maximum concentration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analysis.

b

Bioequivalence CIs were calculated per FDA recommendations (7, 8): exp(Δ ± s√(2/n)t0.05,30, where Δ is the estimated difference in log-transformed values, s is the square root of the mean square error from the mixed-effect model, and t0.05,30 is the critical value of t distribution at α = 0.05 and degrees of freedom = 30. Equivalence is concluded when this CI lies within the 80 to 125% range.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure