Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;79(9):3683–3696. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01344-10

Table 1.

TNF-α secretion of F. tularensis-infected J774 cells

Strain TNF-α secretion (pg/ml)a
1 h 2 h
Noninfected 156.2 ± 6.3*** 168.5 ± 10.6***
F. tularensis subsp. holarctica
    LVS 54.4 ± 3.3 40.9 ± 2.8
    ΔiglA 228.1 ± 49.9* 563.6 ± 14.3***
    ΔpdpE 69.5 ± 5.7 37.2 ± 4.1
    ΔpdpE/pPdpE+ 18.9 ± 0.8*** 27.9 ± 0.9
    ΔiglG 263.9 ± 16.6*** 240.8 ± 47.4**
    ΔiglG/pIglG+ 39.9 ± 0.6*** 35.0 ± 7.2**
    ΔiglI 226.0 ± 37.2** 381.7 ± 33.9***
    ΔiglI/pIglI+ 67.9 ± 18.7** 37.5 ± 4.3***
F. tularensis subsp. novicida
    U112 225.0 ± 26.6 438.1 ± 40.1
    ΔiglI::ermC 266.7 ± 20.0 645.9 ± 52.4*
    ΔiglI::ermC/pIglI+ 355.0 ± 42.3 625.7 ± 40.1
a

F. tularensis-infected (MOI=500) or noninfected J774 cells were incubated in the presence of E. coli-derived LPS (50 ng/ml) for 1 or 2 h. The average TNF-α secretion and standard errors from quadruple samples (n=4) from one out of two representative experiments are shown. In the absence of LPS, the cytokine levels were below the limit of detection for the assay (<15 pg/ml) (data not shown). A Student's 2-sided ttest was used to determine whether the TNF-α secretion induced by the mutants was significantly different from that of the parental strain (Pvalues indicated for each mutant) and whether the TNF-α secretion induced by the complemented strains was statistically different from that induced by their isogenic mutants (P values indicated for each complemented strain).

*,

P < 0.05;

**,

P < 0.01;

***,

P < 0.001.