Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;49(9):3309–3315. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00602-11

Table 1.

Performance comparison of CAM, CAP/CTM, and the prototype CAP/CTM v2/MMx1 and v2/MMx2 assays for the determination of HCV RNA concentrations in patients infected with genotypes 1 to 6

GT No. of samples CAM (reference assay)
CAP/CTM
CAP/CTM v2/MMx1
CAP/CTM v2/MMx2
Mean IU/ml Mean log10IU/ml Mean log10 Difference to CAM Mean log10 Difference to CAM Mean log10 Difference to CAM
GT1 108 3.9 × 104 4.59 4.60 0.01 4.73 0.14 4.54 -0.05
GT2 8 8.1 × 104 4.91 4.49 -0.42 4.89 -0.02 4.96 0.05
GT3 24 8.4 × 104 4.93 4.46 -0.47 5.18 0.25 4.81 -0.12
GT4 87 3.0 × 104 4.48 3.85 -0.63 4.59 0.11 4.38 -0.10
GT5 3 1.9 × 104 5.29 4.62 -0.67 5.28 -0.01 4.85 -0.44
GT6 2 8.6 × 104 4.94 4.51 -0.43 4.87 -0.07 4.65 -0.29