Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;193(18):4672–4684. doi: 10.1128/JB.00353-11

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

saeSP transcripts are more stable than saeSL transcripts. (A) Comparison of P3 promoter activities by lacZ reporter assays. NM, wild-type strain; Δ, sae deletion mutant NMΔsae; RSP, NMΔsae(pCL-RSP); PQRSP, NMΔsae(pCL-PQRSP); RSL, NMΔsae(pCL-RSL); PQRSL, NMΔsae(pCL-PQRSL). (B) Determination of saeS tran- script stability by real-time qRT-PCR. NMΔsae(pCL-RSP) and NMΔsae(pCL-RSL) were grown to exponential growth phase; then, transcription was blocked by rifampin. Cells were collected at the time points indicated, and total RNA was purified. The level of saeS transcripts was measured by real-time qRT-PCR. 16S rRNA was used as a control. Error bars represent standard deviations.