Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;85(18):9568–9577. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00468-11

Table 1.

Confirmation of array predictions: summary of pyrosequencing resultsa

Gene Cell line % of genes predicted by array to be hypo- or hypermethylated following EBV infection
% avg change in methylation status across all CpGs examined
CpG 1 CpG 2 CpG 3 CpG 4 CpG 5 CpG 6 CpG 7
Hypomethylated
    CSMD1 GC B 98 89 87 83 −12.5
LCL 94 80 70 63
    SPRY2 GC B 14 12 12 16 13 16 −11
LCL 2 0 2 7 0 6
    MAGEA3 GC B 18 24 37 39 −9.75
LCL 10 18 29 22
    PRDM1 GC B 31 29 30 24 26 −18
LCL 8 7 14 12 9
    ICMT GC B 44 49 48 88 54 −44
LCL 11 13 6 26 7
    FGFR2 GC B 74 65 72 76 100 86 51 −13.8
LCL 23 62 64 56 94 78 50
    GRB10 GC B 48 91 100 100 80 74 −8.6
LCL 20 73 99 100 85 65
Hypermethylated
    ELL3 GC B 97 62 100 73 8
LCL 97 94 100 75
    TCL6 GC B 31 68 56 100 21 23.2
LCL 57 95 88 100 52
    RBM5 GC B 4 0 4 6 4 2.6
LCL 11 6 4 6 4
    SMAD4 GC B 62 63 50 89 100 6
LCL 75 70 57 92 100
    ID2 GC B 69 69 64 69 61 31 0.7
LCL 56 90 87 56 52 26
a

The direction of the methylation change predicted on the array is recorded for each candidate gene along with the percentage of methylation at each CpG site in both LCL and GC B cells. The average percentage of methylation change is also shown.