Table 1.
Gene | Cell line | % of genes predicted by array to be hypo- or hypermethylated following EBV infection |
% avg change in methylation status across all CpGs examined | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CpG 1 | CpG 2 | CpG 3 | CpG 4 | CpG 5 | CpG 6 | CpG 7 | |||
Hypomethylated | |||||||||
CSMD1 | GC B | 98 | 89 | 87 | 83 | −12.5 | |||
LCL | 94 | 80 | 70 | 63 | |||||
SPRY2 | GC B | 14 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 13 | 16 | −11 | |
LCL | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6 | |||
MAGEA3 | GC B | 18 | 24 | 37 | 39 | −9.75 | |||
LCL | 10 | 18 | 29 | 22 | |||||
PRDM1 | GC B | 31 | 29 | 30 | 24 | 26 | −18 | ||
LCL | 8 | 7 | 14 | 12 | 9 | ||||
ICMT | GC B | 44 | 49 | 48 | 88 | 54 | −44 | ||
LCL | 11 | 13 | 6 | 26 | 7 | ||||
FGFR2 | GC B | 74 | 65 | 72 | 76 | 100 | 86 | 51 | −13.8 |
LCL | 23 | 62 | 64 | 56 | 94 | 78 | 50 | ||
GRB10 | GC B | 48 | 91 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 74 | −8.6 | |
LCL | 20 | 73 | 99 | 100 | 85 | 65 | |||
Hypermethylated | |||||||||
ELL3 | GC B | 97 | 62 | 100 | 73 | 8 | |||
LCL | 97 | 94 | 100 | 75 | |||||
TCL6 | GC B | 31 | 68 | 56 | 100 | 21 | 23.2 | ||
LCL | 57 | 95 | 88 | 100 | 52 | ||||
RBM5 | GC B | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2.6 | ||
LCL | 11 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | ||||
SMAD4 | GC B | 62 | 63 | 50 | 89 | 100 | 6 | ||
LCL | 75 | 70 | 57 | 92 | 100 | ||||
ID2 | GC B | 69 | 69 | 64 | 69 | 61 | 31 | 0.7 | |
LCL | 56 | 90 | 87 | 56 | 52 | 26 |
The direction of the methylation change predicted on the array is recorded for each candidate gene along with the percentage of methylation at each CpG site in both LCL and GC B cells. The average percentage of methylation change is also shown.