Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 29;157(1):509–517. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176578

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Comparison of the diffusion pathways of COS and CO2 from the atmosphere to the site of biochemical reactions in C3 and C4 leaves. Concentrations of COS (pmol mol−1) and CO2 (μmol mol−1) are indicated above and below the lines, respectively. Conductance through resistance steps associated with the boundary layer, stomata, and mesophyll (mol m−2 s−1) are indicated by gbl, gs, and gm, respectively, based on leaves with net CO2 flux of 14 or 20 μmol m−2 s−1 (C3 and C4, respectively), and COS uptake flux of approximately 35 pmol m−2 s−1 (for both plant types). Values of gm (0.3 mol m−2 s−1 for both C4 and C3 leaves, respectively) were estimated by Stimler et al. (2010a) and incorporate dissolution, liquid-phase diffusion, and the biochemical step (assuming first-order reaction); gm estimates for CO2 were based on CO2 concentration at the hydration site derived from isotopic measurements (Gillon and Yakir, 2001).