Table 3. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs)a for pertussis notifications in adolescents aged 12 to 19 years for each year after diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine programme roll-out, by jurisdictional group, Australia, 2004–2009.
Jurisdictional groupingb | Pre-programme epidemic ratec,d (95% CI) |
IRR (95% CI) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | |||
Australian Capital Territory/ South Australia/Victoria | 92.6 (87.4–98.0) | 0.41 (0.36–0.47) | 0.26 (0.23–0.31) | 0.20 (0.17–0.24) | 0.39 (0.34–0.35) | 1.03 (0.93–1.13) | |
New South Wales | 156.8 (150.4–163.4) | 0.29 (0.25–0.32) | 0.20 (0.17–0.22) | 0.13 (0.11–0.15) | 1.22 (1.14–1.30) | 1.23 (1.15–1.31) | |
Western Australia | 284.2 (263.2–306.9) | 0.08 (0.06–0.11) | 0.03 (0.02–0.05) | 0.01 (0.01–0.03) | 0.03 (0.02–0.05) | 0.05 (0.04–0.08) | |
Queensland | 134.7 (127.1–142.8) | 0.57 (0.50–0.64) | 0.36 (0.31–0.42) | 0.18 (0.15–0.22) | 0.29 (0.25–0.34) | 0.95 (0.86–1.05 |
CI, confidence interval.
a These represent the ratios given by dividing the notification rate during each of the two epidemic periods after diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine programme roll-out by the notification rate during the most recent epidemic period before programme roll-out.
b Jurisdictional groupings were based on programme delivery characteristics.
c The recent epidemic periods used in the analysis were as follows: Australian Capital Territory, 2003; South Australia, 2001; Victoria, 2001/2002; New South Wales, 2000/2001; Queensland, 2001/2002; Western Australia, 2004; national, 2001.6
d Per 100 000 population.