Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 2;6(9):e24412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024412

Table 1. The effect of HIV-1 Tat on parameters of DRG excitability.

Control 2 min 4 min 6 min 10 min 15 min
Tat (20 μM)
RMP (mV) −50±0.8 −48±0.8** −48±0.8** −47±0.3** −46±0.4** −45±0.4**
FT (mV) −12.4±0.7 −13.1±0.8 −12.9±1.0 −12.9±1.0 −12.7±0.8 −11.8±0.9
Rheobase (pA) 306±39 252±32** 246±36** 219±23** 207±27** 213±30**
 Normalized rheobase 1.0±0 0.84±0.04** 0.79±0.05** 0.75±0.05** 0.69±0.05** 0.70±0.05**
RTh (MΩ) 146±55 162±62 181±81 177±68 194±84** 198±97**
 Normalized RTh 1.0±0 0.84±0.04 0.79±0.05 0.75±0.05 0.69±0.05** 0.70±0.05**
Tat (1 μM)
RMP (mV) −54±1.2 −50±1.1 −53±1.6 −56±1.2 −49±0.8* −51±1.2
FT (mV) −16.3±1.9 −18.1±2.0 −19.7±2.1 −17.1±2.1 −15.7±1.8 −16.7±2.1
Rheobase (pA) 388±51 352±58 272±36 246±35 229±38 349±63
 Normalized rheobase 1.0±0 0.91±0.08 0.74±0.11 0. 67±0.10 0.65±0.13 0.91±0.09
RTh (MΩ) 104±10.7 105±16.6 139±27.7 192±49.3 192±49.7 114±18.3
 Normalized RTh 1.0±0 0.84±0.04 0.79±0.05 0.75±0.05 0.69±0.05 0.70±0.05
Inactivated Tat (μM)
RMP (mV) −52±1.0 −51±1.1 −49±1.4 −50±1.1 −49±1.1 −51±1.4
FT (mV) −11.9±1.5 −12.2±1.8 −13.4±1.7 −11.3±2.0 −10.6±2.5 −9.6±2.8
Rheobase (pA) 392±51 382±49 378±52 380±59 373±39 423±48
 Normalized rheobase 1.0±0 0.99±0.06 0.99±0.08 0.99±0.10 1.01±0.09 1.11±0.06
RTh (MΩ) 119±22 117±22 106±14 119±21 111±15 107±17
 Normalized RTh 1.0±0 0.99±0.04 0.94±0.07 1.04±0.13 0.99±0.11 0.93±0.08

RMP: resting membrane potential; FT: firing threshold; RTh: resistance at threshold. Normalized rheobase: rheobase was normalized to the control. Normalized RTh: RTh was normalized to the control. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. N = 15.

*p<0.05;

**p<0.01. Groups were compared with controls by Anova or Repeated Measures Anova.