Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr-Jun;2(2):50–59. doi: 10.4161/adna.2.2.16340

Table 4.

Comparison of Tm data to show specificity of binding between mixed base acpcPNA M10a and complementary/single base mismatched DNA

Entry DNA sequence (5′ → 3′) Tm (°C)a ΔTm (°C)b Note
1 AGT GAT CTA C 53.3c - complementary
2 AGT AAT CTA C 26.4 −26.9 pC·dA mismatch
3 AGT TAT CTA C 27.8 −25.5 pC·dT mismatch
4 AGT CAT CTA C 31.0 −22.3 pC·dC mismatch
5 AGT GGT CTA C 23.9c −29.4 pT·dG mismatch
6 AGT GTT CTA C 29.4c −23.9 pT·dT mismatch
7 AGT GCT CTA C 23.8c −29.5 pT·dC mismatch
8 AGT GAG CTA C 26.5 −26.8 pA·dG mismatch
9 AGT GAA CTA C 28.4 −24.9 pA·dA mismatch
10 AGT GAC CTA C 28.8 −24.5 pA·dC mismatch
11 AGT GAT GTA C 26.4 −26.9 pG·dG mismatch
12 AGT GAT ATA C 24.2 −29.1 pG·dA mismatch
13 AGT GAT TTA C 28.5 −24.8 pG·dT mismatch
a

Conditions: 1.0 µM acpcPNA, 1.0 µM DNA, 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, heating rate 1.0°C/min. Tm values are accurate to within ±0.5°C.

b

Tm (mismatched) − Tm (complementary).

c

Data taken from reference 36.