Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 May 6;104(3):e133–e147. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.03.004

Figure 2. Dendrogram classification of the original mice (17 WT & 13 R6/2) according to unsupervised HCA.

Figure 2

Rows #1–17 are the WT mice, whereas rows #18–30 are the R6/2 mice. Looking at the area where there are only two clusters (Dissimilarity range of ~ 1.63–2.26), one can see that subject #30 was classified into one cluster all by itself, and that all other 29 subjects were classified into the other cluster. This classification makes little sense.