Table 3.
Evaluation of the received aftercare in different domains
| Neurocognitive | n (%) | Physical | n (%) | Emotional | n (%) | Social | n (%) | Parenting | n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Need for aftercare | ||||||||||
| Yes | 30 (97) | 34 (89) | 22 (81) | 22 (88) | 11 (69) | |||||
| Received aftercare | ||||||||||
| Yes | 28 (93) | 31 (91) | 19 (86) | 17 (77) | 8 (73) | |||||
| No but was indicated | 2 (7) | 3 (9) | 3 (14) | 5 (23) | 3 (27) | |||||
| Referrera | ||||||||||
| Hospital staff | 10 (36) | 29 (85) | 8 (42) | 2 (17) | 1 (13) | |||||
| Schoolteacher or staff | 9 (32) | 5 (15) | 3 (16) | 6 (35) | 1 (13) | |||||
| Parents themselves | 10 (36) | 4 (12) | 8 (42) | 9 (53) | 4 (50) | |||||
| Not specified | 2 (7) | 2 (6) | 4 (21) | 2 (12) | 2 (25) | |||||
| Need for improvementsa | 17 (57) | 11 (31) | 11 (50) | 12 (57) | 7 (64) | |||||
| More specific | ||||||||||
| Timely response to need for care | 13 (43) | 9 (27) | 7 (32) | 8 (36) | 5 (45) | |||||
| Psycho-education about possible long-term sequelae and available aftercare services and support in finding aftercare service | 11 (37) | 6 (18) | 9 (41) | 5 (23) | 5 (45) | |||||
| Proactive approach from school | 6 (20) | 2 (6) | 1 (5) | 1 (5) | – | |||||
| Proactive screening of needs for aftercare | 7 (23) | 3 (9) | 4 (18) | 6 (27) | 3 (27) | |||||
aMore options were possible in one patient