Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 25;8(8):3114–3133. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8083114

Table 5.

Method of outdoor and indoor pesticide application reported by PEG (ever used method) and SUPERB (used method in the last year).

Lifetime Use of Application Methods (PEG N = 356) Use of application Methods within the last year (SUPERB N = 153)


Application Methods Used for Pests Frequency * Percent * (%) 95th% Confidence interval (%) Frequency * Percent * (%) 95th% Confidence interval (%)
Outdoor 256 71.9 [67.2, 76.6] 95 62.1 [54.3, 69.9]
spray 214 83.6 [79.0, 88.2] 77 81.0 [73.0, 89.1
bait 52 20.3 [15.3, 25.3] 31 32.6 [23.0, 42.2]
granule 55 21.5 [16.4, 26.5] 17 17.9 [10.0, 25.7]
Other ** 45 17.6 [12.9, 22.3] 15 15.8 [8.3, 23.3]
Indoor 269 75.1 [70.6, 79.6] 54 35.3 [27.6, 42.9]
spray 233 86.6 [82.5, 90.7] 35 64.8 [51.7, 78.0]
bait 20 7.4 [4.3, 10.6] 17 31.5 [18.7, 44.3]
granule 10 3.7 [1.4, 6.0] 11 20.4 [9.3, 31.5]
Other ^ 71 26.4 [21.1, 31.7] 9 16.7 [6.4, 26.9]
fogger º 8 5.2 [1.7, 8.8]
*

Frequency does not add to number of subjects, nor does total percentage equal 100% because participants could choose multiple methods of application;

**

Outdoor other category includes: powder, candles, foam, strips, traps, or liquid;

^

Indoor other category include: powder, candles, foam, fogger, strips, traps, stakes, gel;

º

Only SUPERB specifically questioned participants about use of foggers.