Table 3. The relative fluorescence intensity in 6 groups.
Solution | Only ACh group | Ryanodine+ACh group | Thapsigargin+ACh group |
---|---|---|---|
Hank’s solution | 1.430±0.010 U | 1.140±0.0004 U | 1.145±0.002 U |
1.580±0.020 U * | 1.398±0.003 U ** | ||
D-Hank’s solution | 1.003± .022 U | 1.1395±0.0006 U | 1.141±0.001 U |
1.140±0.001 U # | 1.210±0.010 U ## |
Before the application, the resting fluorescence intensity in each group was 1U; b) Except only ACh group in D-Hank’s solution, the relative fluorescence intensity in all the other groups had statistical significance after application (p<0.05);
p<0.05 for Ryanodine+ACh group VS ACh group (Hank’s solution);
p<0.05 for Thapsigargin+ACh group VS ACh group (Hank’s solution);
p<0.05 for Ryanodine+ACh group VS ACh group (D-Hank’s solution);
p<0.05 for Thapsigargin+ACh group VS ACh group (D-Hank’s solution).