Skip to main content
letter
. 2009 Dec 29;53(4):e30. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2009.e30

Table 3. The relative fluorescence intensity in 6 groups.

Solution Only ACh group Ryanodine+ACh group Thapsigargin+ACh group
Hank’s solution 1.430±0.010 U 1.140±0.0004 U 1.145±0.002 U
1.580±0.020 U * 1.398±0.003 U **
D-Hank’s solution 1.003± .022 U 1.1395±0.0006 U 1.141±0.001 U
1.140±0.001 U # 1.210±0.010 U ##
a)

Before the application, the resting fluorescence intensity in each group was 1U; b) Except only ACh group in D-Hank’s solution, the relative fluorescence intensity in all the other groups had statistical significance after application (p<0.05);

*

p<0.05 for Ryanodine+ACh group VS ACh group (Hank’s solution);

**

p<0.05 for Thapsigargin+ACh group VS ACh group (Hank’s solution);

#

p<0.05 for Ryanodine+ACh group VS ACh group (D-Hank’s solution);

##

p<0.05 for Thapsigargin+ACh group VS ACh group (D-Hank’s solution).