Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Jul 31;50(9):938–948.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.06.011

Table 2.

Group effects and group × age interactions

Seed
Connectivity
Group Difference
Group × Age Interaction
Directiond x, y, z Z ke Directiond x, y, z z ke
L rACC HC > ODC 6, 39, 6 3.82 68a HC1 > OCD1 −6, 51, 12 3.47 45
DC HC2,3,4 = OCD2, 3, 4
R Medial frontal pole OCD > HC 15, 69, 9 3.47 43b
DC
L L dACC ------ ------ ------ ------ HC1 > OCD1 −9, 27, 27 3.42 39c
MT OCD2 > HC2
OCD3,4 = HC3,4
R Bilateral dACC ------ ------ ------ ---- HC1 > OCD1 −6, 24, 33 3.76 194
MT HC2, 3, 4 = OCD2, 3, 4 9, 15, 36 3.73

Note: dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, DC = dorsal caudate, HC = healthy control, L = left, R = right, MT = medial-dorsal thalamus, OCD = obsessive compulsive disorder, rACC = rostral anterior cingulate cortex,.

a

Exclusion of medicated patients in post-hoc analysis revealed a trend towards group × age interaction (HC1 > OCD1; HC2,3,4 = OCD2, 3, 4), but no main effect of group.

b

Twenty-six of the 43 voxels in this cluster extended laterally from the medial frontal cortext (MFC) search volume.

c

Exclusion of patients with subclinical obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms revealed reduced connectivity in child patients, but no difference between adolescent patients and controls.

d

Planned contrasts at each developmental stage (1 = Child, 2 = Adolescent, 3 = Young Adult, 4 = Older Adult; p < .05, corrected).

e

Cluster-level significant at p < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons within medial frontal cortex search volumes.