Skip to main content
. 2011 May 23;39(16):7336–7347. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr183

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) Diagram for mismatch repair avoidance using proximal modified bases that can prevent MutS recognition and activation of the MutHLS complex. (b) Use of proximal modified bases 5-Methyl-dC (grey bars) and 2′-Fluoro-deoxyUridine (black bars) to improve the AR efficiency of different mismatch types. In a mutS(+) strain, efficiencies of oligos with 2′-Fluoro-U and 5-Methyl-dC bases within 5 bp from the mismatch are compared with oligos that do not contain modified bases (white bars). The mean and ranges of values are shown for n = 2. (c) AR efficiency for the same oligos as (b), but in a mutS(−) strain. Variation in the AR efficiency of different oligos in a mutS(−) background is attributed to the impact of oligo sequences and local structural variations of the genome on annealing and folding characteristics. The mean and ranges of values are shown for n=2.