Table 1.
Percentage RNA editing at specific sites in transcripts isolated from whole wildtype Canton S male or female flies, embryos and third instar larvae
Male | n | Female | n | Embryo | n | Larva | n | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caα1D | ||||||||
2061 L/L | 36 | 4 | 38 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
2083 N/D | 97 | 4 | 95 | 4 | 22 | 6 | 20 | 3 |
2097 L/L | 96 | 4 | 89 | 4 | a | 4 | 0 | 3 |
2098 R/G | 96 | 4 | 92 | 4 | a | 4 | 0 | 3 |
2140 I/M | 100 | 2 | 100 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 18 | 3 |
Eag | ||||||||
1864 K/R | 58 | 11 | 66 | 4 | 76 | 2 | 89 | 3 |
2107 Y/C | 89 | 11 | 92 | 5 | 46 | 3 | 70 | 5 |
2159 V/V | 16 | 7 | a | 5 | 0 | 3 | a | 4 |
2163 N/D | 88 | 7 | 86 | 5 | 52 | 3 | 66 | 4 |
2560 K/R | 78 | 3 | 60 | 2 | a | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Nic 34E | ||||||||
1872 L/L | 100 | 6 | 76 | 4 | 85 | 4 | 100 | 4 |
1873 I/V | 100 | 6 | 78 | 4 | 85 | 4 | 100 | 4 |
2020 T/A | 100 | 7 | 97 | 6 | 100 | 4 | 100 | 3 |
2023 I/V | 38 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 16 | 4 | 17 | 3 |
2028 L/L | 35 | 5 | 28 | 3 | 15 | 2 | 15 | 3 |
2037 I/M | 67 | 5 | 60 | 3 | 41 | 2 | 48 | 3 |
2049 L/L | 16 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 2 | a | 3 |
2052 S/S | 71 | 4 | 63 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 40 | 3 |
2062 I/V | 100 | 4 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 3 |
2065 I/V | 53 | 4 | 41 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 11 | 3 |
Rdl | ||||||||
728 L/L | 23 | 8 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
735 R/G | 65 | 8 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 2 | a | 2 |
1218 I/V | 100 | 8 | 87 | 8 | 78 | 2 | 100 | 2 |
1251 N/D | 22 | 4 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
1448 Q/Q | 8 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
1449 M/V | 22 | 4 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
The left column lists the specific editing sites in target transcripts and the bold numbers indicate the percentage editing at that site in the different samples. The total number of RT–PCR reactions sequenced is represented by n.
aEditing is probably 0 however due to background in sequencing electropherogram 0 cannot be assigned to this position.