Skip to main content
. 2011 May 27;39(16):7249–7262. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr423

Table 1.

Percentage RNA editing at specific sites in transcripts isolated from whole wildtype Canton S male or female flies, embryos and third instar larvae

Male n Female n Embryo n Larva n
Caα1D
    2061 L/L 36 4 38 4 0 5 0 2
    2083 N/D 97 4 95 4 22 6 20 3
    2097 L/L 96 4 89 4 a 4 0 3
    2098 R/G 96 4 92 4 a 4 0 3
    2140 I/M 100 2 100 4 14 6 18 3
Eag
    1864 K/R 58 11 66 4 76 2 89 3
    2107 Y/C 89 11 92 5 46 3 70 5
    2159 V/V 16 7 a 5 0 3 a 4
    2163 N/D 88 7 86 5 52 3 66 4
    2560 K/R 78 3 60 2 a 2 0 3
Nic 34E
    1872 L/L 100 6 76 4 85 4 100 4
    1873 I/V 100 6 78 4 85 4 100 4
    2020 T/A 100 7 97 6 100 4 100 3
    2023 I/V 38 5 30 5 16 4 17 3
    2028 L/L 35 5 28 3 15 2 15 3
    2037 I/M 67 5 60 3 41 2 48 3
    2049 L/L 16 4 17 3 0 2 a 3
    2052 S/S 71 4 63 1 40 1 40 3
    2062 I/V 100 4 100 2 100 2 100 3
    2065 I/V 53 4 41 1 15 2 11 3
Rdl
    728 L/L 23 8 23 4 0 2 0 2
    735 R/G 65 8 68 4 0 2 a 2
    1218 I/V 100 8 87 8 78 2 100 2
    1251 N/D 22 4 14 8 0 1 0 2
    1448 Q/Q 8 4 12 7 0 2 0 2
    1449 M/V 22 4 20 7 0 2 0 2

The left column lists the specific editing sites in target transcripts and the bold numbers indicate the percentage editing at that site in the different samples. The total number of RT–PCR reactions sequenced is represented by n.

aEditing is probably 0 however due to background in sequencing electropherogram 0 cannot be assigned to this position.