Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 4;23(5):538–544. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr049

Table 4.

Multivariate regression analyses

Coef SE P-Value 95% CI
Model 1: Individual impact of each element on ICU VAP rates
Raising of head −0.66 0.79 0.41 −2.22 to 0.90
Sedation vacation −0.88 0.84 0.30 −2.53 to 0.78
Prevention of stomach ulcers −0.77 0.86 0.37 −2.45 to 0.91
DVT prophylaxis 0.50 0.67 0.46 −0.81 to 1.81
Model 2: Impact of complying with one of two VAP-related elements on ICU VAP rates
One of two VAP-related elements (sedation vacation or raising head of bed) −0.79 0.55 0.15 −1.86 to 0.29
Model 3: Impact of complying with both VAP-related bundle elements on ICU VAP rates
Sedation vacation and raising head of bed −1.81 0.62 <0.01 −3.02 to −0.60
Model 4: Impact of VAP-related bundle elements on ICU CLABSI rates
Sedation vacation and raising head of bed −0.22 0.58 0.71 −1.36 to 0.92

All models multivariate OLS regressions with Huber-White standard errors to account for intra-hospital correlations across ICUs. In all models the following covariates were controlled for: geographic region, teaching status, presence of hospital epidemiologist (full and part-time), proportion infection preventionist (IP) certified, IP staffing, use of electronic surveillance system, hand hygiene, years in National Healthcare Safety Network, bedsize and type of ICU.