Table 4.
Coef | SE | P-Value | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1: Individual impact of each element on ICU VAP rates | |||||
Raising of head | −0.66 | 0.79 | 0.41 | −2.22 to 0.90 | |
Sedation vacation | −0.88 | 0.84 | 0.30 | −2.53 to 0.78 | |
Prevention of stomach ulcers | −0.77 | 0.86 | 0.37 | −2.45 to 0.91 | |
DVT prophylaxis | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.46 | −0.81 to 1.81 | |
Model 2: Impact of complying with one of two VAP-related elements on ICU VAP rates | |||||
One of two VAP-related elements (sedation vacation or raising head of bed) | −0.79 | 0.55 | 0.15 | −1.86 to 0.29 | |
Model 3: Impact of complying with both VAP-related bundle elements on ICU VAP rates | |||||
Sedation vacation and raising head of bed | −1.81 | 0.62 | <0.01 | −3.02 to −0.60 | |
Model 4: Impact of VAP-related bundle elements on ICU CLABSI rates | |||||
Sedation vacation and raising head of bed | −0.22 | 0.58 | 0.71 | −1.36 to 0.92 |
All models multivariate OLS regressions with Huber-White standard errors to account for intra-hospital correlations across ICUs. In all models the following covariates were controlled for: geographic region, teaching status, presence of hospital epidemiologist (full and part-time), proportion infection preventionist (IP) certified, IP staffing, use of electronic surveillance system, hand hygiene, years in National Healthcare Safety Network, bedsize and type of ICU.