Skip to main content
. 2011 May 7;38(10):1788–1797. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1833-x

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards regression model of EFS

EFS HR (95% CI) p
177Lu/90Y vs 90Y >0.1
Age ≥ 56 vs < 56 >0.1
Sex M vs F >0.1
Size of lesion ≥ median vs < median >0.1
Number of lesions > median vs < median 7.2 (1.76–29.4) 0.006
CGA > median vs < median >0.1