Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD001977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001977.pub2

Comparison 5. Acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture for peripheral joint OA change from baseline analysis.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain (Time point equal to or less than three months and closest to eight weeks post‐randomization) 9 1835 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.28 [‐0.45, ‐0.11]
2 Function (Time point equal to or less than three months and closest to eight weeks post‐randomization) 9 1829 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.28 [‐0.46, ‐0.09]
3 Total score (Time point equal to or less than three months and closest to eight weeks post‐randomization) 8 1767 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.29 [‐0.50, ‐0.09]
4 Pain (26 weeks after baseline) 4 1399 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.10 [‐0.21, 0.01]
5 Function (26 weeks after baseline) 4 1398 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.11 [‐0.22, 0.00]
6 Total score (26 weeks after baseline) 4 1398 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.11 [‐0.22, ‐0.00]