Table 1.
Gene and pathway statistics for each comparison
| Comparison | Significant genes, q < 0.01 | Enriched pathways, p < 0.05 | Edges with weight < = lmax |
|---|---|---|---|
| HF vs LF, t = 0 | 1971 (17.3%) | 54 (22.9%) | 24055 (16.8%) |
| LF t = 0 vs t = 0.6 | 24 (0.2%) | 17 (7.2%) | 5054 (3.5%) |
| LF t = 0 vs t = 2 | 573 (5.0%) | 43 (18.2%) | 13251 (9.2%) |
| LF t = 0 vs t = 48 | 1607 (14.1%) | 57 (24.15%) | 20220 (14.1%) |
| HF t = 0 vs t = 0.6 | 773 (6.7%) | 13 (5.5%) | 15784 (11.0%) |
| HF t = 0 vs t = 2 | 2815 (24.7%) | 17 (7.2%) | 26845 (18.7%) |
| HF t = 0 vs t = 48 | 736 (6.4%) | 40 (17.0%) | 16857 (11.7%) |
Number of significant genes, enriched pathways and edges in the interaction network that have a weight shorter than the maximal path length and hence contribute to the pathway interactions. Percentages are relative to the total number of measured genes, the total number of pathways and the total number of edges in the interaction network respectively.