Table 2.
Statistics for each pathway interaction network
| Comparison | Nodes (pathways > = 1 interaction) | Enriched nodes | Edges (p < 0.001) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HF vs LF, t = 0 | 123 (52.1%) | 36 (66.7%) | 207 |
| LF t = 0 vs t = 0.6 | 17 (7.2%) | 5 (20.0%) | 25 |
| LF t = 0 vs t = 2 | 57 (24.2%) | 12 (27.9%) | 52 |
| LF t = 0 vs t = 48 | 82 (34.8%) | 27 (47.4%) | 108 |
| HF t = 0 vs t = 0.6 | 43 (18.2%) | 3 (23.1%) | 54 |
| HF t = 0 vs t = 2 | 111 (47.0%) | 10 (58.8%) | 160 |
| HF t = 0 vs t = 48 | 82 (34.8%) | 19 (47.5%) | 92 |
The first column shows the comparison for which the network is generated. The second column shows the number of pathways in the network that have at least one significant interaction. The third column shows the number of pathways from the second column that are also enriched. The last column shows the number of significant pathway interactions. Percentages are relative to the total number of pathways and total number of enriched pathways respectively.