Table 4.

Loci with Evidence of Selection in HapMap3

Chromosome	Gene or Region	SNP	Position	p Values
				JPT-CH	LWK-YRI	CEU-TSI
2	LCT	rs6754311	136424452	N/A	0.60	2.03 × 10−15
3	SLC9A9/Corf58	rs7649861	145653390	0.65	2.68× 10−7	0.04
6	HLA	rs7745413	30023448	1.35 × 10−7	0.15	0.15
6	HLA	rs28366191	32472168	0.08	0.23	0.69
6	HLA	rs6901541	32550239	0.13	0.19	0.64
6	HLA	rs2179915	33173712	N/A	1.08 × 10−3	0.87
7	CD36	rs12721454	79678275	N/A	2.63 × 10−5	0.40
7	CD36	rs513740	79872884	0.11	9.74 × 10−4	0.65
7	CD36	rs6944302	79942827	N/A	7.47 × 10−7	0.09
8	PSCA	rs2976397	143761615	5.87 × 10−7	0.01	0.60
8	PSCA	rs2920283	143754039	4.58 × 10−6	0.01	0.75
11	HBB+HBG2	rs7936387	5256204	N/A	0.66	N/A
11	OPCML	rs11223548	133036865	8.90 × 10−7	0.90	N/A
12	KITLG	rs11104947	87467111	4.88 × 10−7	N/A	0.43
15	OCA2	rs12913832	26039213	N/A	N/A	1.42 × 10−8

We report all highly differentiated SNPs with strong or suggestive evidence for selection (p < 10⁻⁶). We see several well-studied examples of selection such as LCT, and OCA2 in Europeans, KITLG in East Asians, and CD36 in Africans. However, several markers significant in our original analysis of African populations do not appear significant in the LWK-YRI comparison. This may be because of the small sample size taken from each of the HapMap3 populations.