Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Drug Educ. 2011;41(2):203–234. doi: 10.2190/DE.41.2.e

Table 2.

Responses to Substance Offer Scenarios

Strategy type Brainstormed as potential responsea Preferred: “Would work every time”b Rejected: “Would never use”b Preferred adjusted to 100%c Rejected adjusted to 100%c
Refuse—say “No” to the offer or that you do not want to use the substance 10.5% 11.0% (38/345) 23.2% (80/345) 5.9% 15.2%
Explain—give a reason for resisting the offer, including a fabricated reason 14.6% 10.3% (39/380) 7.1% (27/380) 5.5% 4.7%
Avoid/Evade—stay away from the situation or take an evasive action while remaining 4.6% 10.0% (19/190) 4.2% (8/190) 5.3% 2.8%
Leave—leave the surroundings altogether or move away from the offeror or substance 11.2% 18.1% (52/287) 8.7% (25/287) 9.6% 5.7%
Pass—pass on the offered substance to someone else 4.4% 13.2% (16/121) 5.8% (7/121) 7.0% 3.8%
Pretend—create a pretense of accepting the offer without using the substance 2.2% 23.6% (21/89) 2.2% (2/89) 12.5% 1.5%
Redirect—change the subject or offer a substitute activity; give an irrelevant or inane response unconnected to the offer 7.3% 7.7% (19/248) 10.9% (27/248) 4.1% 7.1%
Destroy/Discard—destroy the substance, openly or discreetly; eliminate the chance for others to use it 4.9% 15.5% (29/187) 6.4% (12/187) 8.3% 4.2%
Set Relationship Boundaries—question the appropriateness of the offeror’s behavior, given their relationship 3.4% 14.8% (20/135) 5.9% (8/135) 7.9% 3.9%
Accept—accept the substance offered or agree to take it, including conditionally 13.4% 24.4% (78/320) 30.9% (99/320) 13.0% 20.3%
Anger/Aggression—negative verbal or physical response 1.5% 8.5% (8/94) 23.4% (22/94) 4.5% 15.4%
Challenge—counter offer with strong language, forceful opinions, or name calling; challenge the offeror’s status 14.1% 12.3% (41/333) 22.5% (75/333) 6.5% 14.8%
Deny/Disclaim—view offer as hypothetical or counter-factual; state that (s)/he and/or other people would not use the substance 6.8% 8.7% (24/276) 1.1% (3/276) 4.6% 0.7%
Distance/Reflect—assess or judge others’ substance use in a detached manner; distance oneself from them or their actions 1.0% 10.0% (4/40) 0.0% (0/40) 5.3% 0.0%
Total N (responses or selections) 410 408/3045 395/3045
Total % 100% 188.1c 152.4c 100% 100%
a

Percentage of all strategies presented on poster boards as initially brainstormed potential responses to the 25 scenarios.

b

Raw count/number of times this strategy type was presented.

c

Percentages adjusted proportionally across all types to add to 100% (i.e., multiplying column 3 percentages by 100/188.1 and column 4 percentages by 100/152.4.