Table IV.
Complex | Water treatmenta | Lowest energy (kcal/mol) | RMSD versus crystal (Å) |
---|---|---|---|
Designed | −65.88 | 0.54 | |
1DF7 | Explicit | −64.65 | 0.41 |
Omitted | −57.23 | 0.46 | |
Designed | −52.11 | 0.71 | |
1JIO | Explicit | −51.44 | 0.46 |
Omitted | −44.87 | 0.75 | |
Designed | −33.22 | 0.46 | |
1KI8 | Explicit | −37.71 | 0.33 |
Omitted | −30.58 | 0.45 | |
Designed | −41.92 | 0.42 | |
1NNC | Explicit | −38.36 | 0.55 |
Omitted | −31.32 | 0.92 | |
Designed | −54.41 | 0.25 | |
1VZQ | Explicit | −59.41 | 0.31 |
Omitted | −43.92 | 0.27 |
aIn the explicit case, all the water molecules from the crystal structure were retained. In the omitted case, all the water molecules from the crystal structure were deleted. In the designed case, all the water molecules were deleted, but the water placement design was performed on the ensemble of ligand poses.