Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 19;24(10):777–789. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzr036

Table IV.

The scores of the lowest-energy conformation and the heavy-atom RMSD against the crystal structure, showing results of the three water treatments for the five test cases

Complex Water treatmenta Lowest energy (kcal/mol) RMSD versus crystal (Å)
Designed −65.88 0.54
1DF7 Explicit −64.65 0.41
Omitted −57.23 0.46
Designed −52.11 0.71
1JIO Explicit −51.44 0.46
Omitted −44.87 0.75
Designed −33.22 0.46
1KI8 Explicit −37.71 0.33
Omitted −30.58 0.45
Designed −41.92 0.42
1NNC Explicit −38.36 0.55
Omitted −31.32 0.92
Designed −54.41 0.25
1VZQ Explicit −59.41 0.31
Omitted −43.92 0.27

aIn the explicit case, all the water molecules from the crystal structure were retained. In the omitted case, all the water molecules from the crystal structure were deleted. In the designed case, all the water molecules were deleted, but the water placement design was performed on the ensemble of ligand poses.