Skip to main content
. 2011 May 31;28(8):699–705. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9583-z

Table 1.

Originally Publisheda and Adjusted Odds Ratios of the Association Between ART and Major Malformations

Reference & study typeb Originally published odds ratio Significance Adjusted odds ratio Significance
4 C 0.54 P < .05 0.38 P < .05
12 V 0.81 NS 0.59 P < .05
2 C 0.77 NS 0.64 NS
18 V 0.86 NS 0.79 P < .05
20 V 0.90 NS 0.84 NS
15 V 1.00 NS 1.00 NS
13 V 1.04 NS 1.02 NS
3 X 1.07 P < .05 1.05 NS
19 C 1.24 NS 1.07 NS
9 V 1.21 NS 1.11 NS
6 V 1.19 P < .05 1.12 NS
16 V 1.29 NS 1.13 NS
7 V 1.25 NS 1.17 NS
10 X 1.27 P < .05 1.18 P < .05
17 V 1.38 NS 1.18 NS
5 X 2.05 P < .05 1.69 P < .05
8 C 2.23 P < .05 1.82 P < .05
14c V 15.4 NS 5.4 NS
Overall Odds Ratiod 1.14e P < .05 1.01 NS

a18 of the original studies are shown here; as explained in the text, one study has been removed.

bReference numbers refer to references in this publication, not the original publication. V: IVF Study; X: ICSI Study; C: Combined Results of ICSI and IVF.

cNo MM in control group; when .5 is substituted for zero, the adjusted OR is 5.4.

dSince the odds ratios in our meta-analysis were not significantly different for IVF versus ICSI and for singleton versus multiple, the data were pooled to obtain an overall odds ratio.

eOverall odds when 18 studies included.