Table 1.
Reference & study typeb | Originally published odds ratio | Significance | Adjusted odds ratio | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 C | 0.54 | P < .05 | 0.38 | P < .05 |
12 V | 0.81 | NS | 0.59 | P < .05 |
2 C | 0.77 | NS | 0.64 | NS |
18 V | 0.86 | NS | 0.79 | P < .05 |
20 V | 0.90 | NS | 0.84 | NS |
15 V | 1.00 | NS | 1.00 | NS |
13 V | 1.04 | NS | 1.02 | NS |
3 X | 1.07 | P < .05 | 1.05 | NS |
19 C | 1.24 | NS | 1.07 | NS |
9 V | 1.21 | NS | 1.11 | NS |
6 V | 1.19 | P < .05 | 1.12 | NS |
16 V | 1.29 | NS | 1.13 | NS |
7 V | 1.25 | NS | 1.17 | NS |
10 X | 1.27 | P < .05 | 1.18 | P < .05 |
17 V | 1.38 | NS | 1.18 | NS |
5 X | 2.05 | P < .05 | 1.69 | P < .05 |
8 C | 2.23 | P < .05 | 1.82 | P < .05 |
14c V | 15.4 | NS | 5.4 | NS |
Overall Odds Ratiod | 1.14e | P < .05 | 1.01 | NS |
a18 of the original studies are shown here; as explained in the text, one study has been removed.
bReference numbers refer to references in this publication, not the original publication. V: IVF Study; X: ICSI Study; C: Combined Results of ICSI and IVF.
cNo MM in control group; when .5 is substituted for zero, the adjusted OR is 5.4.
dSince the odds ratios in our meta-analysis were not significantly different for IVF versus ICSI and for singleton versus multiple, the data were pooled to obtain an overall odds ratio.
eOverall odds when 18 studies included.