Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 29;28(8):747–757. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9578-9

Table 2.

Studies included in systematic review for calculating the diagnostic efficiency statistics

Studies Test Morphological criteria Gold Standard Number of blastomeres analyzed Chromosomes analyzed by FISH TP FP FN TN
Baltaci et al. [92] Morphology Veeck et al. [98] FISH 1 X, Y, 13, 18, 21 150 115 274 437
Magli et al. [93] Morphology Alikani et al. [99] FISH 1 X, Y, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22 2978 1106 531 490
Munné et al. [94] Morphology cell number, fragmentation degree, blastomere sized FISH 1 X, Y, 13, 16, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 1832 651 2401 1170
Rubio et al. [95] Morphology Alikani et al. [99] FISH 1 or 2 X, Y, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22 1895 762 1417 1637
Ziebe et al. [96] Morphology cell number, fragmentation degree and location, blastomere sized, cytoplasmic appearance FISH Every blastomere X, Y, 13, 16, 18, 21, 22 41 34 7 21
Wilton et al. [46] PGS-FISH Not reported CGH 1 X, Y, 13, 16, 18, 21, 22 29.5 0.5 19.5 50.5
Keskintepe et al. [97] PGS-FISH Not reported CGH 1 X, Y, 17, 16, 18, 21, 22 32.5 0.5 10.5 2.5
Daphnis et al. [52] PGS-FISH Not reported CGH 1 or 2 X, Y, 18 allways 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, 22 17.5 0.5 10.5 3.5

TP True positive; FP False positive; FN False negative; TN True negative

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure