Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug;34(4pt2):e37–e48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01133.x

Table 3.

Semen quality of the entire study group young men (‘all men’) from the Turku area in Finland, and a subgroup of these without previous or current conditions that potentially could affect the semen quality

Adjusted median (95% CI) for investigation periods

1998–99 2001–03 2006
Semen volume (mL):
 All men 3.4 (3.1–3.7) 3.4 (3.1–3.6) 3.3 (3.0–3.7)
 Subgroup 3.4 (3.0–3.7) 3.4 (3.1–3.8) 3.4 (3.0–3.9)
Sperm concentration (million/mL):
 All men 67 (57–80) 60 (51–71) 48 (39–60)
 Subgroup 65 (52–819 58 (47–72) 48 (36–64)
Total sperm count (million):
 All men 228 (190–274) 201 (169–238) 165 (132–207)
 Subgroup 218 (173–275) 200 (160–249) 172 (128–231)
Normal morphology (%):
 All men 9.8 (9.2–10.4) 9.1 (8.5–9.7) 8.6 (7.6–9.5)
 Subgroup 9.8 (9.0–10.6) 9.0 (8.3–9.7) 8.9 (7.6–10.1)
Total normal spermatozoa (million):
 All men 18 (14–23) 15 (12–19) 11 (8–15)
 Subgroup 18 (14–25) 15 (11–20) 13 (9–20)
Motile (%):
 All men 65 (63–66) 74 (72–75) 73 (71–74)
 Subgroup 65 (63–67) 74 (72–76) 73 (71–76)

For definition of the subgroup, see Table 1.

Adjusted median and 95% CI (confidence interval) calculated by linear regression analysis.

Sperm concentration, total sperm and semen volume adjusted to a period of ejaculation of 95 h for a 19-year-old man. Motility and morphology were also adjusted to represent a 19-year-old man. See text for further details.