Table 2.
Relative levels of NO in the olive fruit AZ–AC after treatments
Cultivar | Control | ET | Put | Spd | AOA | CoCl2 | CHA | MGBG | |
ARB | |||||||||
7 d | 1.0 | 0.5* | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4* | 1.0 | |
14 d | 1.0 | 0.5* | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.5* | 0.8 | |
PIC | |||||||||
7 d | 1.0 | 0.1* | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.4* | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | |
14 d | 1.0 | 0.1* | 1.2 | 2.3* | 1.1 | 3.8* | 0.1* | 0.1* |
Olive trees (ARB and PIC cultivars) were sprayed with water (control), 10 mM ethephon (ET), 1 mM putrescine (Put), 1 mM spermidine (Spd), 10 mM aminooxyacetic acid (AOA), 10 mM cobalt chloride (CoCl2), 10 mM cyclohexylamine (CHA), or 1 mM methylglycoxalbis-guanylhydrazone (MGBG), and the fruit AZ–AC were then harvested 7 d and 14 d after spraying. NO content was measured as relative fluorescence units (RFU) using DAF-FM-DA dye and a fluorometer (n=5, ±SE), and the fold ratio is calculated with the corresponding control sample (water-treated sample). The experiment was repeated three times with similar results, and data for one representative experiment are shown. Asterisks indicate values that were determined by the t-test to be significantly different (P <0.05) from control.