Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 1;62(13):4447–4465. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err124

Table 2.

Relative levels of NO in the olive fruit AZ–AC after treatments

Cultivar Control ET Put Spd AOA CoCl2 CHA MGBG
ARB
7 d 1.0 0.5* 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.4* 1.0
14 d 1.0 0.5* 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.5* 0.8
PIC
7 d 1.0 0.1* 1.2 1.0 1.4* 1.0 0.8 1.0
14 d 1.0 0.1* 1.2 2.3* 1.1 3.8* 0.1* 0.1*

Olive trees (ARB and PIC cultivars) were sprayed with water (control), 10 mM ethephon (ET), 1 mM putrescine (Put), 1 mM spermidine (Spd), 10 mM aminooxyacetic acid (AOA), 10 mM cobalt chloride (CoCl2), 10 mM cyclohexylamine (CHA), or 1 mM methylglycoxalbis-guanylhydrazone (MGBG), and the fruit AZ–AC were then harvested 7 d and 14 d after spraying. NO content was measured as relative fluorescence units (RFU) using DAF-FM-DA dye and a fluorometer (n=5, ±SE), and the fold ratio is calculated with the corresponding control sample (water-treated sample). The experiment was repeated three times with similar results, and data for one representative experiment are shown. Asterisks indicate values that were determined by the t-test to be significantly different (P <0.05) from control.