Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 10.
Published in final edited form as: Sociol Educ. 2009 Oct;82(4):344–367. doi: 10.1177/003804070908200403

Table 3.

Predicted Probabilities of Having a Mentor from Multinomial Logistic Regression for Advantageda and Disadvantagedb Youth

Mentor Mentor’s Social Role
Relative Friend Teacher Community
Social Background
 Advantage 66 11 15 18 22
 Disadvantage 62 13 16 15 18
Parental Resources
 Advantage 68 14 14 20 20
 Disadvantage 60 10 16 14 20
Peer Resources
 Advantage 68 12 17 17 21
 Disadvantage 61 12 14 15 20
School Resources
 Advantage 64 11 19 16 18
 Disadvantage 65 12 14 18 21
Personal Resources
 Advantage 73 12 13 23 25
 Disadvantage 53 11 17 10 15
Full Model
 Advantage 82 11 15 32 24
 Disadvantage 44 9 15 7 13

Notes: N = 7,840—Includes only respondents whose mentors became important after Wave I to ensure temporal ordering. Bolded predicted probabilities represent statistically significant differences (i.e., did not have overlapping 95% confidence intervals) within resource type and social role. Within a row of the table, the sum of mentor’s social roles may not equal the report of mentor due to rounding.

a

Advantage: Social Background—White or Asian,.24 neighborhood disadvantage, Parental Resources—$58k parental income; Participates in PTA, lives with both biological parents, a parent with a college degree, 3.75 connection to parents; Peer Resources—nominated 10 friends, 3.3 Mean friends’ Wave I GPA, 1.16 peer network centrality; School Resources—4 teacher/student environment, 20 students per class at school, 2 (401-1000 students) school size; Personal Resources—very attractive personality, very attractive physically, high aspirations to attend college, 113 PVT score, 3.5 GPA.

b

Disadvantage: Social Background—Black, Hispanic, or Native American, .78 neighborhood disadvantage; Parental Resources—$23k parental income; Does not participate in PTA, does not live with both biological parents, highest parent education is high school diploma, 2.5 connection to parents; Peer Resources—nominated 4 friends, 2.5 Mean friends’ Wave I GPA, .34 peer network centrality; School Resources—3.5 student/teacher environment, 30 students per class at school, 3 (1001-4000 students) school size; Personal Resources—unattractive personality, physically unattractive, low aspirations for college, 87 PVT score, 2.0 GPA.